Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
0BInvestment Evaluation Summary<br />
TNM-GS-809-0720<br />
2. Commission the new 220 kV Bus Zone Protection B scheme (GE Multilin type B90), maintaining the existing<br />
Brown Boveri type INX2 scheme, de-commissioning the back up high impedance scheme in order to be able to<br />
provide CT for new scheme.<br />
3. Commission the new 110 kV Bus Zone Protection A Scheme (Areva P740), de-commission the<br />
existing Brown Boveri type INX2 scheme.<br />
4. Commission the new 220 kV Bus Zone Protection A Scheme (Areva P740), de-commission the existing Brown<br />
Boveri type INX2 scheme.<br />
3 INVESTMENT NEED<br />
3.1 RELIABILITY<br />
Each of the bus bar protection schemes at Farrell Substation (110 kV and 220 kV) has recently suffered failures due to<br />
deteriorating components. A summary of the bus bar protection scheme failures at Farrell Substation is presented in<br />
Figure 1 and Error! Reference source not found.. These failures have resulted in extended protection scheme outages.<br />
The existing bus bar protection schemes have an auto-test function that operates once per week. If the equipment fails its<br />
auto-test then the protection scheme is blocked from operation. Given the auto-test only operates once per week, then the<br />
average protection scheme outage would be 3.5 days. An allowance of around 20 hours for repair then the total (average)<br />
protection scheme outage time would be approximately be 4.5 days.<br />
The failure rates for the bus bar protection schemes at Farrell Substation are increasing as the condition of the<br />
components continue to deteriorate. The components of these systems fail randomly and they can not be predicted.<br />
Figure 1 and Table 1 shows that as a whole the protection schemes are failing more often and are becoming more<br />
unreliable over time.<br />
Figure 1 – Bus bar protection scheme failures at Farrell Substation<br />
Failures<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010<br />
Year<br />
Table 1 – Bus bar protection scheme failures at Farrell Substation<br />
Date Scheme<br />
Outage duration of<br />
Protection scheme<br />
(estimated average)<br />
Description of Failure<br />
30/9/2008 110 kV 4.5 days 110 kV bus bar protection scheme failed autotest.<br />
Output reed relays on modules MCT425A<br />
and BLR429 replaced.<br />
© <strong>Transend</strong> Networks Pty Ltd 4 of 10