24.02.2013 Views

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

0BInvestment Evaluation Summary<br />

TNM-GS-809-0720<br />

2. Commission the new 220 kV Bus Zone Protection B scheme (GE Multilin type B90), maintaining the existing<br />

Brown Boveri type INX2 scheme, de-commissioning the back up high impedance scheme in order to be able to<br />

provide CT for new scheme.<br />

3. Commission the new 110 kV Bus Zone Protection A Scheme (Areva P740), de-commission the<br />

existing Brown Boveri type INX2 scheme.<br />

4. Commission the new 220 kV Bus Zone Protection A Scheme (Areva P740), de-commission the existing Brown<br />

Boveri type INX2 scheme.<br />

3 INVESTMENT NEED<br />

3.1 RELIABILITY<br />

Each of the bus bar protection schemes at Farrell Substation (110 kV and 220 kV) has recently suffered failures due to<br />

deteriorating components. A summary of the bus bar protection scheme failures at Farrell Substation is presented in<br />

Figure 1 and Error! Reference source not found.. These failures have resulted in extended protection scheme outages.<br />

The existing bus bar protection schemes have an auto-test function that operates once per week. If the equipment fails its<br />

auto-test then the protection scheme is blocked from operation. Given the auto-test only operates once per week, then the<br />

average protection scheme outage would be 3.5 days. An allowance of around 20 hours for repair then the total (average)<br />

protection scheme outage time would be approximately be 4.5 days.<br />

The failure rates for the bus bar protection schemes at Farrell Substation are increasing as the condition of the<br />

components continue to deteriorate. The components of these systems fail randomly and they can not be predicted.<br />

Figure 1 and Table 1 shows that as a whole the protection schemes are failing more often and are becoming more<br />

unreliable over time.<br />

Figure 1 – Bus bar protection scheme failures at Farrell Substation<br />

Failures<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010<br />

Year<br />

Table 1 – Bus bar protection scheme failures at Farrell Substation<br />

Date Scheme<br />

Outage duration of<br />

Protection scheme<br />

(estimated average)<br />

Description of Failure<br />

30/9/2008 110 kV 4.5 days 110 kV bus bar protection scheme failed autotest.<br />

Output reed relays on modules MCT425A<br />

and BLR429 replaced.<br />

© <strong>Transend</strong> Networks Pty Ltd 4 of 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!