24.02.2013 Views

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

0BInvestment Evaluation Summary<br />

TNM-GS-809-0720<br />

7.3 OPTION 3: STAGED REPLACEMENT OF SELECTED ASSETS IN-SITU<br />

7.3.1 SCOPE<br />

The scope for this option is essentially the same as option 2, but implemented using a staged approach based on<br />

transmission circuit criticality. This option includes:<br />

� initial replacement of assets that have an assigned transmission circuit criticality rating of four or five (three bays);<br />

and<br />

� initial replacement of other assets that are known to present a safety risk, including post insulators, voltage<br />

transformers and current transformers; and<br />

� deferred replacement of the remaining 110 kV assets by up to three years (two bays).<br />

The <strong>capital</strong> cost of this option includes an initial $1.55 million ($June 2007) to replace critical assets and to address<br />

safety issues followed by a deferred <strong>capital</strong> cost of $6.36 million ($June 2007) to replace remaining 110 kV assets three<br />

years later.<br />

7.3.2 BENEFITS<br />

The benefits for this option are that it:<br />

� allows <strong>Transend</strong> to achieve the <strong>capital</strong> <strong>expenditure</strong> objectives in the mid-term;<br />

� addresses the safety issues associated with the 110 kV assets identified in section 4 of this document;<br />

� defers <strong>capital</strong> <strong>expenditure</strong> associated with replacing the 110 kV disconnectors;<br />

� defers <strong>capital</strong> <strong>expenditure</strong> associated with lower criticality assets for up to 3 years;<br />

� addresses the performance issues identified in section 4 of this document, with the exception of those transmission<br />

circuits that have a criticality less than four; and<br />

� reduces the ongoing maintenance requirements and costs associated with the site.<br />

7.3.3 DRAWBACKS<br />

The drawbacks for this option are that it:<br />

� results in a higher overall <strong>capital</strong> cost than option 2, primarily due to the use of live tank circuit breakers, contractor<br />

remobilisation and increased internal costs;<br />

� does not align with <strong>Transend</strong>’s policy to utilise dead tank circuit breakers when replacing 110 kV live tank current<br />

transformers and circuit breakers for two 110 kV bays; and<br />

� will need additional transmission circuit outages to undertake the works.<br />

7.3.4 CONCLUSION<br />

This option is technically viable.<br />

© <strong>Transend</strong> Networks Pty Ltd 11 of 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!