Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
0BInvestment Evaluation Summary<br />
TNM-GS-809-0720<br />
7.3 OPTION 3: STAGED REPLACEMENT OF SELECTED ASSETS IN-SITU<br />
7.3.1 SCOPE<br />
The scope for this option is essentially the same as option 2, but implemented using a staged approach based on<br />
transmission circuit criticality. This option includes:<br />
� initial replacement of assets that have an assigned transmission circuit criticality rating of four or five (three bays);<br />
and<br />
� initial replacement of other assets that are known to present a safety risk, including post insulators, voltage<br />
transformers and current transformers; and<br />
� deferred replacement of the remaining 110 kV assets by up to three years (two bays).<br />
The <strong>capital</strong> cost of this option includes an initial $1.55 million ($June 2007) to replace critical assets and to address<br />
safety issues followed by a deferred <strong>capital</strong> cost of $6.36 million ($June 2007) to replace remaining 110 kV assets three<br />
years later.<br />
7.3.2 BENEFITS<br />
The benefits for this option are that it:<br />
� allows <strong>Transend</strong> to achieve the <strong>capital</strong> <strong>expenditure</strong> objectives in the mid-term;<br />
� addresses the safety issues associated with the 110 kV assets identified in section 4 of this document;<br />
� defers <strong>capital</strong> <strong>expenditure</strong> associated with replacing the 110 kV disconnectors;<br />
� defers <strong>capital</strong> <strong>expenditure</strong> associated with lower criticality assets for up to 3 years;<br />
� addresses the performance issues identified in section 4 of this document, with the exception of those transmission<br />
circuits that have a criticality less than four; and<br />
� reduces the ongoing maintenance requirements and costs associated with the site.<br />
7.3.3 DRAWBACKS<br />
The drawbacks for this option are that it:<br />
� results in a higher overall <strong>capital</strong> cost than option 2, primarily due to the use of live tank circuit breakers, contractor<br />
remobilisation and increased internal costs;<br />
� does not align with <strong>Transend</strong>’s policy to utilise dead tank circuit breakers when replacing 110 kV live tank current<br />
transformers and circuit breakers for two 110 kV bays; and<br />
� will need additional transmission circuit outages to undertake the works.<br />
7.3.4 CONCLUSION<br />
This option is technically viable.<br />
© <strong>Transend</strong> Networks Pty Ltd 11 of 13