Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5. CUSTOMER CONSULTATION<br />
0BInvestment Evaluation Summary<br />
TNM-GS-809-0720<br />
<strong>Transend</strong> has liaised with all relevant stakeholders regarding the planned works at Farrell Substation. Short outages will<br />
be required for each of the transmission line, transformer, and bus coupler circuits to implement the works. Some of<br />
these outages will constrain generation, so it is important that planned outages be coordinated with Hydro Tasmania to<br />
ensure that the impact of the planned outages is minimised.<br />
6. BENEFITS<br />
Replacement of the 220 kV and 110 kV bus bar protection schemes at Farrell Substation will provide the following<br />
benefits:<br />
� the likelihood of unplanned bus bar protection scheme outages will be reduced, thereby improving the reliability<br />
and security of the transmission network;<br />
� the occurrence of events that cause power flows through the substation to be constrained will be reduced;<br />
� obsolete, unreliable and difficult to maintain protection schemes will be replaced with modern, reliable<br />
equipment that incorporate self supervision functions, thereby reducing ongoing operations and maintenance<br />
costs; and<br />
� ensure ongoing compliance with the NER;<br />
� facilitate future <strong>capital</strong> works at Farrell Substation;<br />
� additional disturbance recording facilities will be provided, thereby improving power system analysis and fault<br />
response capability.<br />
� reduction in the risk of non-operation of the bus bar protection scheme for bus bar faults. If faults are not<br />
cleared appropriately then bus bar faults can result in damage to primary equipment, system instability issues<br />
and forced outages; and<br />
� reduction in the risk of mal-operation of the bus bar protection schemes due to partial failure of the scheme.<br />
Mal-operation of the scheme (ie operation of the scheme when there is no fault present) can result in forced<br />
outages and instability issues.<br />
7. OPTIONS ANALYSIS<br />
The following viable options have been considered to address the identified investment needs and compliance issues<br />
associated with the bus bar protection schemes at Farrell Substation:<br />
1. maintain the existing bus bar protection schemes and defer replacement;<br />
2. replace the 110 kV and 220 kV bus bar protection schemes at Farrell Substation without installing duplicate<br />
systems; and<br />
3. replace the 110 kV and 220 kV bus bar protection schemes at Farrell Substation and install duplicate systems.<br />
An alternative option that included maintaining the existing bus bar protection schemes and installing additional schemes<br />
was considered but discounted because it did not provide any material benefits. The existing bus bar protection schemes<br />
would still be susceptible to failure and would not be able to be repaired because spare components are not available.<br />
The viable options are discussed in further detail in the following sections.<br />
7.1- MAINTAIN THE EXISTING BUS BAR PROTECTION SCHEMES AND DEFER<br />
REPLACEMENTS<br />
This option comprises maintaining the existing Brown Boveri type INX2 bus bar protection schemes.<br />
© <strong>Transend</strong> Networks Pty Ltd 8 of 10