24.02.2013 Views

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

� reduced burden on spare parts management by using standard equipment;<br />

� provide additional functionality and remote monitoring capability;<br />

� alignment with strategic asset management plans; and<br />

� location of equipment which allows for future expansion.<br />

7 OPTIONS ANALYSIS<br />

The following options have been considered for the redevelopment of Knights Road Substation:<br />

1. manage existing assets and defer replacement;<br />

2. replace selected assets in situ;<br />

3. staged replacement of selected assets in situ; and<br />

4. replace all assets in situ.<br />

Other options considered at a high-level, but discounted for the reasons mentioned include:<br />

0BInvestment Evaluation Summary<br />

TNM-GS-809-0720<br />

� Offsite greenfield development - not considered to be a cost effective alternative as other solutions can be<br />

implemented within the existing perimeter of Knights Road Substation at a substantially lower cost.<br />

7.1 OPTION 1: MANAGE EXISTING ASSETS AND DEFER REPLACEMENT<br />

7.1.1 SCOPE<br />

The scope for this option includes:<br />

� replace assets that are known to present a significant safety risk, including post insulators and voltage transformers<br />

in 2014;<br />

� replace protection and control schemes due to condition and customer request;<br />

� continue existing maintenance practices, albeit accelerated due to the declining condition and ageing of assets;<br />

� undertake repairs and corrective maintenance as required; and<br />

� defer replacement of certain assets for up to five years.<br />

The <strong>capital</strong> cost of this option includes an initial $6.74 million ($June 2007) to address safety issues followed by a<br />

deferred <strong>capital</strong> cost of $1.65 million ($June 2007) to replace remaining 110 kV assets five years later.<br />

7.1.2 BENEFITS<br />

The benefit for this option is the deferral of <strong>capital</strong> <strong>expenditure</strong> and that the identified safety issues are addressed.<br />

7.1.3 DRAWBACKS<br />

The drawbacks for this option are that it would:<br />

� not allow <strong>Transend</strong> to achieve the <strong>capital</strong> <strong>expenditure</strong> objectives;<br />

� not satisfactorily address the performance, reliability and design issues associated with circuit breakers and current<br />

transformers identified in section 4;<br />

� incur increased ongoing operating <strong>expenditure</strong> due to increased maintenance, condition monitoring requirements and<br />

corrective maintenance requirements;<br />

� not be sustainable given the reliability issues associated with the 110 kV primary and secondary assets, in particular<br />

the circuit breakers, current transformers and protection and control equipment;<br />

� result in an increased number of loss of electricity supply events at Knights Road Substation when compared with<br />

other options;<br />

© <strong>Transend</strong> Networks Pty Ltd 9 of 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!