Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
� defer replacement of remaining assets by up to two years.<br />
0BInvestment Evaluation Summary<br />
TNM-GS-809-0720<br />
The <strong>capital</strong> cost of this option includes an initial $4.86 million ($June 2007) to address the highest priority issues,<br />
followed by a deferred <strong>capital</strong> cost of $22.57 million ($June 2007) to replace the remaining assets two years later.<br />
7.1.2 BENEFITS<br />
The benefit for this option is the deferral of <strong>capital</strong> <strong>expenditure</strong>.<br />
7.1.3 DRAWBACKS<br />
The drawbacks for this option are that it:<br />
� does not address the performance, reliability and design issues identified in Section 4;<br />
� incurs increased ongoing operating <strong>expenditure</strong> due to increased maintenance, condition monitoring requirements<br />
and corrective maintenance requirements;<br />
� is not sustainable given the reliability issues associated with the 110 kV assets;<br />
� does not address the operational issues associated with the 110 kV ring bus arrangement;<br />
� incurs the longest, and most frequent outages due to maintenance regimes that are required to maintain the existing<br />
assets;<br />
� involves an increased risk of loss of supply events at Creek Road Substation; and<br />
� does not align with the recommendations made in the independent report by Ascension Consulting and APC-<br />
Worley. Knowingly operating existing assets with identified performance and condition issues potentially exposes<br />
<strong>Transend</strong> to litigation issues in the event of a supply disruption to Hobart’s CBD caused by an asset failure at Creek<br />
Road Substation.<br />
7.1.4 CONCLUSION<br />
Although option 1 has the least <strong>capital</strong> cost option in the short term, it is not the preferred option because it does not<br />
ensure the reliable operation of Creek Road Substation.<br />
7.2 OPTION 2 - REPLACE ASSETS IN SITU<br />
7.2.1 SCOPE<br />
The scope for this option includes:<br />
� in-situ replacement of the existing live tank circuit breakers with dead tank units with integral current transformers;<br />
� replacement of all 110 kV disconnectors with new motorised units in situ;<br />
� replacement of all bus bars with aluminium conductor and compression fittings;<br />
� replacement of protection and control schemes; and<br />
� implement revised maintenance practices.<br />
This option includes redeveloping the site using the existing ring-bus arrangement.<br />
The <strong>capital</strong> cost of this option is $27.27 million ($June 2007).<br />
7.2.2 BENEFITS<br />
The benefits for this option are that it:<br />
� addresses most of the asset issues in Section 4; and<br />
� reduces the ongoing maintenance requirements and costs associated with the site.<br />
© <strong>Transend</strong> Networks Pty Ltd 11 of 17