24.02.2013 Views

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

Transend - Appendix 5 Renewal capital expenditure - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Burnie-Waratah 110 kV Transmission Line Wood Poles<br />

TNM-CR-808-0888<br />

Issue 1.0, November 2008<br />

In 2006 an evaluation 1 was conducted into replacing the wood poles with steel poles, as and when<br />

they were condemned. The report looked at replacing both wood poles in the structure with steel<br />

poles. The report found that there was a whole of life premium of 14 per cent in replacing two<br />

treated wood poles with two modern steel poles. However, the benefits of steel structures in<br />

comparison to wood structures are numerous including:<br />

(a) improved resistance to fire (both pole and pole top);<br />

(b) unlike some wood poles, steel poles do not leach chemicals into the soil;<br />

(c) greater availability; and<br />

(d) significantly lighter than wood poles.<br />

The only negative aspect of a steel pole is the potential for corrosion. However, through the<br />

utilisation of galvanised surfaces, top and bottom pole caps, and HDPE sleeve at the ground to air<br />

interface, the risk of corrosion is sufficiently mitigated, resulting in a life expectancy of<br />

approximately 75 years.<br />

Due to these advantages, <strong>Transend</strong> investigated whether further cost savings could be obtained<br />

through the replacement of two wood poles with a single steel pole. It was found that this was<br />

technically feasible and the cost per suspension tower replacement was approximately 16 per cent<br />

cheaper than utilising two wood poles.<br />

Based on this evaluation it was decided that a new structure using only one steel pole would be a<br />

viable alternative for suspension structures with the two steel pole replacements being adopted for<br />

the strain structures.<br />

2.4 SPARE PARTS AND CONTINGENCY PLANNING<br />

<strong>Transend</strong> has a small number of steel poles to cater for contingency events and can source wood<br />

poles from local suppliers in emergencies.<br />

2.5 SAFETY<br />

As detailed within <strong>Transend</strong>’s Transmission Line Support Structures Asset Management Plan<br />

(TNM-SY-808-0223), the risk of some aged wood poles failing and causing the transmission line<br />

conductor to fall and either cause a fire or expose line workers or the public to a safety hazard is<br />

high. The risk mitigation actions recommended in this instance are to inspect, test and replace<br />

(where needed) affected structures.<br />

2.6 ENVIRONMENT<br />

Environmental risks include the possibility of a bushfire start and the inappropriate disposal of the<br />

Copper Chrome Arsenate (CCA) 2 impregnated wood poles.<br />

3 ASSET MANAGEMENT OPTIONS<br />

The costing comparisons associated with the following options are contained in the 2006<br />

evaluation report (see footnote 2).<br />

1 Hydro Tasmania Consulting report ’110kV Burnie-Waratah transmission line comparative cost study of<br />

Sureline Steel poles as an alternative replacement for condemned wood poles’ dated 7 June 2006.<br />

2 CCA is a mixture of inorganic components containing the elements copper, chromium and arsenic. Lebow<br />

(1996) explains that the primary role of chromium is in CCA fixation, through a complex series of reactions<br />

driven by its reduction from the hexavalent state to the trivalent state after it is applied to the wood. Copper<br />

and arsenic provide the efficacy of the preservative, copper primarily as a fungicide, and arsenic more for its<br />

activity as an insecticide, and also for activity against copper-tolerant fungi. Cookson (2001) claims that<br />

while arsenic was originally thought to be needed for insect control, the latest theory is that arsenic is more<br />

useful in controlling copper-tolerant brown rotting fungi.<br />

Page 8 of 9 © <strong>Transend</strong> Networks Pty Ltd<br />

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!