A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
116 ■ A CLASS WITH DRUCKER<br />
“No, sir.”<br />
“‘All right,’ he said and walked out the door. That was the end of the<br />
matter. Because of the h<strong>on</strong>or code, despite his dislike of me, he<br />
accepted my word. And I was not expected to report the guy who<br />
had actually watched from my window, because that was a regulatory<br />
breach, not an h<strong>on</strong>or violati<strong>on</strong>.” 2<br />
This, then, is the background from which I pers<strong>on</strong>ally received <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> this subject.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s Reacti<strong>on</strong> to the H<strong>on</strong>or Code<br />
Peter asked me how the West Point h<strong>on</strong>or code would apply for a “white<br />
lie.” That is, what if you have a parent who was seriously ill. The doctor<br />
tells you that there is no chance of the patient surviving, but that you<br />
should do everything possible to maintain your parent’s morale. “If your<br />
parent asks you what the doctor said about his chances, is it dish<strong>on</strong>orable<br />
for you to tell him that all would be well?” Peter asked. I had to agree that<br />
this would not be dish<strong>on</strong>orable.<br />
Peter menti<strong>on</strong>ed other situati<strong>on</strong>s in which the h<strong>on</strong>or code, good as it<br />
might be, might not apply. He noted that the code did not apply to moral<br />
values, which was an individual thing. “A man could be a womanizer, a<br />
drunkard, not take proper care of his family, and still be c<strong>on</strong>sidered h<strong>on</strong>orable<br />
by the West Point code,” he said. Again, I had to agree that Peter<br />
was correct, although I pointed out that it was not <strong>on</strong>ly the words of the<br />
code that were important, but its spirit.<br />
Peter agreed and again noted the differing definiti<strong>on</strong>s of bribery <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g>in<br />
differing cultures. He went <strong>on</strong> to say that the West Point h<strong>on</strong>or code had<br />
stood the test of time and was worthy as a test of h<strong>on</strong>or whether at West<br />
Point, or anywhere else in our culture. But <strong>on</strong>ce again he cauti<strong>on</strong>ed that<br />
<strong>on</strong>e should not c<strong>on</strong>fuse h<strong>on</strong>or <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> ethics, integrity, or the law, even<br />
though there was clearly a relati<strong>on</strong>ship am<strong>on</strong>g them. He reiterated that different<br />
interpretati<strong>on</strong>s of what was and what was not h<strong>on</strong>orable might prevail<br />
in different cultures.<br />
Later, I thought of other examples in which the Code of H<strong>on</strong>or did not<br />
apply. One was negotiati<strong>on</strong>s, during which verbally exaggerating or minimizing<br />
some things is c<strong>on</strong>sidered normal. However, <strong>on</strong>ce an agreement is<br />
reached, both parties are expected to abide by the terms. Thus, as a result,