04.03.2013 Views

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HOW TO MOTIVATE THE KNOWLEDGE WORKER ■ 227<br />

Maslow’s first level c<strong>on</strong>sists of physiological needs like eating or<br />

breathing. Once these basic physiological needs are satisfied, people seek<br />

the next highest level. These are security or safety needs. That’s where<br />

salary, benefits, and job security come in. Note that they are also at the<br />

bottom of the pyramid.<br />

On the next level are social or affiliati<strong>on</strong> needs. After this comes the<br />

esteem level. Respect and recogniti<strong>on</strong> are motivati<strong>on</strong>al at this level. Maslow’s<br />

highest level is self-actualizati<strong>on</strong>. That is, to be everything you are capable<br />

of, Maslow also identified two categories of needs not <strong>on</strong> his hierarchy.<br />

These were the desire to know and understand, and aesthetic needs.<br />

Let’s see how Maslow’s theory might affect motivati<strong>on</strong> from a practical<br />

standpoint. Once knowledge workers have achieve their needs at a certain<br />

level, they are no l<strong>on</strong>ger motivated by the levels below. Do you stop and<br />

worry about breathing? Not unless you have health problems affecting<br />

your ability to breathe. It is the same <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> salary, benefits, and job security.<br />

If an employee has a salary, benefits, and job security in amounts he finds<br />

acceptable, these may no l<strong>on</strong>ger motivate. Of course, if there is a threat of<br />

losing these three factors, they may become motivati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>on</strong>ce again.<br />

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs helps to explain why high salary, good<br />

benefits, and job security may not be as important as other motivati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

factors, except as symbols of these other factors.<br />

Symbols are important. Some years ago, I worked at a company that<br />

gave a salary review every year. The amount of annual salary raise was<br />

keyed to performance. A top performer could get as much as a 10 percent<br />

increase. An average performer received a lower percentage increase for<br />

the year. Some<strong>on</strong>e performing below par didn’t receive an increase. One<br />

year the company had a very bad year. Company management felt that it<br />

could not afford the same percentage of increases as it had used in the<br />

past. It explained the situati<strong>on</strong> to all employees and informed them of its<br />

decisi<strong>on</strong>. Every<strong>on</strong>e in the company, including top management, would be<br />

limited to a two percent increase for the top performers. Despite the fact<br />

that the actual amount of increase was much lower than in previous<br />

years, it was still a motivator because the increases were symbolic of high<br />

achievement and were not awarded to every<strong>on</strong>e.<br />

Different Motivators Accomplish Different Things<br />

According to Peter, c<strong>on</strong>sidering Maslow’s hierarchy by itself was insufficient.<br />

Frederick Herzberg, who I menti<strong>on</strong>ed previously, built <strong>on</strong> Maslow’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!