A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DRUCKER IN THE CLASSROOM ■ 13<br />
Most professors would definitely turn their noses up at a professi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
book like <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s, even if it met their length requirements, because it<br />
was not academic. And his idea of c<strong>on</strong>centrating <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e secti<strong>on</strong> per<br />
course would be equally frowned up<strong>on</strong>. However, to me, the value of<br />
Peter’s classic book is immeasurable.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Rebel<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> was a man of great courage in his thinking, writing, and in his<br />
teaching, and not <strong>on</strong>ly in his unorthodox use of the same book for many<br />
courses. As a result, though he made unequaled c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s to management<br />
thinking in the 20th and 21st centuries, he was frequently<br />
ignored, and shockingly, even ridiculed by some fellow academics. Much<br />
of this was pure jealousy, but it has a basis in the type of research an academic<br />
is expected to do and how he is supposed to disseminate the<br />
results of his research.<br />
Peter frequently said, “The corporati<strong>on</strong> is my laboratory.” He meant<br />
that he observed what was going <strong>on</strong> in a company or companies, analyzed<br />
what happened, and drew relevant c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s which he published in a<br />
way that could be understood and put to use by management practiti<strong>on</strong>ers.<br />
Most academics didn’t buy that. To them, there is <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e kind of<br />
research: scientific research based <strong>on</strong> mostly quantitative methods. This<br />
research is disseminated by publishing in “the scientific journals” of business,<br />
not by books or practiti<strong>on</strong>er-read journals like The Harvard Business<br />
Review or The Wall Street Journal. Moreover, these “scientific” articles are<br />
not written for practiti<strong>on</strong>ers, but for fellow academics. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> was an<br />
academic, but he wrote for practiti<strong>on</strong>ers, and he wrote to be understood.<br />
Many academics didn’t like it and resented his success.<br />
I didn’t realize the prejudice in the academic community against<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> until I began to interview for an academic positi<strong>on</strong>. When some<br />
professors <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> whom I interviewed learned that I had studied under<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>, they let loose <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> a variety of snide comments. I remember <strong>on</strong>e<br />
senior professor at a mid-level university telling me, “If <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> were<br />
interviewing for a job here, we might be willing to offer him a junior level<br />
positi<strong>on</strong>.” This comment originated from a professor who had c<strong>on</strong>tributed<br />
little, if anything, to management thinking and development. I could<br />
barely c<strong>on</strong>trol my anger, and it must have been noticeable. I did not<br />
receive an offer from that particular university. Well-known business