A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
14 ■ A CLASS WITH DRUCKER<br />
author Tom Peters <strong>on</strong>ce wrote: “<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> effectively by-passed the intellectual<br />
establishment. So it’s not surprising that they hated his guts.” 1<br />
In November 1984, when Peter turned 75, The Los Angeles Times did a<br />
special report devoted entirely to him and his accomplishments. They<br />
asked a few well-known academic writers, including Rosabeth Moss Kanter<br />
from the Harvard Business School and Warren Bennis from the University<br />
of Southern California, what they had learned from Peter <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> and<br />
what they thought that he had c<strong>on</strong>tributed to the management discipline.<br />
As I recall, this list included Tom Peters, who while not an academic,<br />
had co-authored the mega-best seller, In Search of Excellence.<br />
All wrote short pieces extolling Peter’s accomplishments and wishing him<br />
a Happy Birthday.<br />
However, <strong>on</strong>e writer used this public forum for praising <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> to<br />
show his disdain instead. This was a professor who had authored a bestselling<br />
book a few years earlier which set off what became a well-known<br />
management fad, but he was basically an academic researcher in the traditi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
sense. His c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to this special Los Angeles Times tribute was<br />
something to the effect that he really couldn’t comment as he had never<br />
read <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>, since <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>, he said, didn’t publish in scientific journals.<br />
Peter really didn’t care. Those kinds of criticisms never bothered him.<br />
He went <strong>on</strong> his own way as an academic rebel and made major c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
which frequently challenged c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al wisdom, were not based<br />
<strong>on</strong> quantitative studies, and significantly changed management and how it<br />
was practiced.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> invariably did what he thought was right. For example, each<br />
of his courses required several short papers. Though he might have sixty<br />
students, he graded every single paper himself. He never <strong>on</strong>ce used a<br />
teaching assistant to grade for him. I might have “Too glib,” or “Now I am<br />
more c<strong>on</strong>fused than ever,” scribbled across a paper, which I had thought<br />
was pretty good. However, if this happened, it was written by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
himself, and not some graduate assistant who was assigned to help him<br />
grade papers. Except in 2003–2005, when I taught at an <strong>on</strong>line university<br />
whose official policy it was to have graduate assistants and subordinate<br />
professors grade all except doctoral papers, I did my own grading. And<br />
since my students have also complained about being unable to decipher<br />
my comments, I may have acquired this habit from Peter. First of all, I<br />
always thought it was right, but also I thought, “If Peter <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> can do<br />
it, so can I.”