04.03.2013 Views

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 ■ A CLASS WITH DRUCKER<br />

author Tom Peters <strong>on</strong>ce wrote: “<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> effectively by-passed the intellectual<br />

establishment. So it’s not surprising that they hated his guts.” 1<br />

In November 1984, when Peter turned 75, The Los Angeles Times did a<br />

special report devoted entirely to him and his accomplishments. They<br />

asked a few well-known academic writers, including Rosabeth Moss Kanter<br />

from the Harvard Business School and Warren Bennis from the University<br />

of Southern California, what they had learned from Peter <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> and<br />

what they thought that he had c<strong>on</strong>tributed to the management discipline.<br />

As I recall, this list included Tom Peters, who while not an academic,<br />

had co-authored the mega-best seller, In Search of Excellence.<br />

All wrote short pieces extolling Peter’s accomplishments and wishing him<br />

a Happy Birthday.<br />

However, <strong>on</strong>e writer used this public forum for praising <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> to<br />

show his disdain instead. This was a professor who had authored a bestselling<br />

book a few years earlier which set off what became a well-known<br />

management fad, but he was basically an academic researcher in the traditi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

sense. His c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to this special Los Angeles Times tribute was<br />

something to the effect that he really couldn’t comment as he had never<br />

read <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>, since <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>, he said, didn’t publish in scientific journals.<br />

Peter really didn’t care. Those kinds of criticisms never bothered him.<br />

He went <strong>on</strong> his own way as an academic rebel and made major c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

which frequently challenged c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al wisdom, were not based<br />

<strong>on</strong> quantitative studies, and significantly changed management and how it<br />

was practiced.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> invariably did what he thought was right. For example, each<br />

of his courses required several short papers. Though he might have sixty<br />

students, he graded every single paper himself. He never <strong>on</strong>ce used a<br />

teaching assistant to grade for him. I might have “Too glib,” or “Now I am<br />

more c<strong>on</strong>fused than ever,” scribbled across a paper, which I had thought<br />

was pretty good. However, if this happened, it was written by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

himself, and not some graduate assistant who was assigned to help him<br />

grade papers. Except in 2003–2005, when I taught at an <strong>on</strong>line university<br />

whose official policy it was to have graduate assistants and subordinate<br />

professors grade all except doctoral papers, I did my own grading. And<br />

since my students have also complained about being unable to decipher<br />

my comments, I may have acquired this habit from Peter. First of all, I<br />

always thought it was right, but also I thought, “If Peter <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> can do<br />

it, so can I.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!