04.03.2013 Views

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64 ■ A CLASS WITH DRUCKER<br />

problem solver’s soluti<strong>on</strong>. I had understood that this was developed by the<br />

military in the 19th century. However, during my investigati<strong>on</strong>, I discovered<br />

that this method was also used and taught at Harvard University.<br />

Later yet, I learned that other professi<strong>on</strong>s, such as the law, have used a very<br />

similar approach to analyzing and reaching logical c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s when c<strong>on</strong>fr<strong>on</strong>ted<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> difficult and complex problems.<br />

The left-brain approach involves:<br />

■ defining the problem;<br />

■ deciding <strong>on</strong> the relevant informati<strong>on</strong> bearing <strong>on</strong> the problem;<br />

■ developing potential alternative soluti<strong>on</strong>s to the problem;<br />

■ analyzing these alternatives;<br />

■ developing soluti<strong>on</strong>s from this analysis;<br />

■ and finally in making the decisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Problem Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />

You can’t get “there” until you know where “there” is. That’s not <strong>on</strong>e of<br />

Peter <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s injuncti<strong>on</strong>s; it’s <strong>on</strong>e of mine. That’s my way of emphasizing<br />

that in order to solve any problem, you’ve got first to understand<br />

exactly what the problem is. That’s the “there” in a problem situati<strong>on</strong>. The<br />

shipbuilding problem was not to be able to build the ships the British way,<br />

it was to build ships. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> saw Welch’s restructuring problem as having<br />

to do <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> trying to manage a number of businesses that didn’t fit the<br />

strengths of the overall corporati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

You can see here where <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s instructi<strong>on</strong> to begin <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> ignorance is<br />

so important. With the shipbuilding problem, the problem previously had<br />

been defined incorrectly. It had been defined as: “How can we build the<br />

ships the British way <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g>out the same human and physical resources?”<br />

The fact was, you couldn’t. If Kaiser’s ignorance hadn’t been brought to the<br />

problem so that this problem statement was redefined, Kaiser and other<br />

potential American emergency shipbuilders might still be working <strong>on</strong> the<br />

problem, or l<strong>on</strong>g since decided that it couldn’t be d<strong>on</strong>e. Using 1940’s technology<br />

available at the time, the problem just couldn’t have been solved.<br />

Similarly, had a large c<strong>on</strong>sulting c<strong>on</strong>cern accepted GE’s problem and<br />

defined it as simply the restructuring of GE, they probably would have<br />

embarked <strong>on</strong> a massive program of analysis of each individual business

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!