A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
64 ■ A CLASS WITH DRUCKER<br />
problem solver’s soluti<strong>on</strong>. I had understood that this was developed by the<br />
military in the 19th century. However, during my investigati<strong>on</strong>, I discovered<br />
that this method was also used and taught at Harvard University.<br />
Later yet, I learned that other professi<strong>on</strong>s, such as the law, have used a very<br />
similar approach to analyzing and reaching logical c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s when c<strong>on</strong>fr<strong>on</strong>ted<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> difficult and complex problems.<br />
The left-brain approach involves:<br />
■ defining the problem;<br />
■ deciding <strong>on</strong> the relevant informati<strong>on</strong> bearing <strong>on</strong> the problem;<br />
■ developing potential alternative soluti<strong>on</strong>s to the problem;<br />
■ analyzing these alternatives;<br />
■ developing soluti<strong>on</strong>s from this analysis;<br />
■ and finally in making the decisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Problem Definiti<strong>on</strong><br />
You can’t get “there” until you know where “there” is. That’s not <strong>on</strong>e of<br />
Peter <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s injuncti<strong>on</strong>s; it’s <strong>on</strong>e of mine. That’s my way of emphasizing<br />
that in order to solve any problem, you’ve got first to understand<br />
exactly what the problem is. That’s the “there” in a problem situati<strong>on</strong>. The<br />
shipbuilding problem was not to be able to build the ships the British way,<br />
it was to build ships. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> saw Welch’s restructuring problem as having<br />
to do <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> trying to manage a number of businesses that didn’t fit the<br />
strengths of the overall corporati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
You can see here where <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s instructi<strong>on</strong> to begin <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> ignorance is<br />
so important. With the shipbuilding problem, the problem previously had<br />
been defined incorrectly. It had been defined as: “How can we build the<br />
ships the British way <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g>out the same human and physical resources?”<br />
The fact was, you couldn’t. If Kaiser’s ignorance hadn’t been brought to the<br />
problem so that this problem statement was redefined, Kaiser and other<br />
potential American emergency shipbuilders might still be working <strong>on</strong> the<br />
problem, or l<strong>on</strong>g since decided that it couldn’t be d<strong>on</strong>e. Using 1940’s technology<br />
available at the time, the problem just couldn’t have been solved.<br />
Similarly, had a large c<strong>on</strong>sulting c<strong>on</strong>cern accepted GE’s problem and<br />
defined it as simply the restructuring of GE, they probably would have<br />
embarked <strong>on</strong> a massive program of analysis of each individual business