A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
198 ■ A CLASS WITH DRUCKER<br />
in competiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> other student teams representing competing “companies.”<br />
The envir<strong>on</strong>mental c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s changed every week, representing<br />
a fiscal quarter in real life, as did the performance of each “company”<br />
based <strong>on</strong> inputs provided by the students in reacti<strong>on</strong> to the previous<br />
quarter’s (i.e., last week’s) situati<strong>on</strong> and also the reacti<strong>on</strong>s of and inputs<br />
of other student teams.<br />
For example, <strong>on</strong>e could shift dollar resources from research and development<br />
to sales. That decisi<strong>on</strong> might help out in the short run, but it could<br />
hurt in other areas or in several quarters later. The simulati<strong>on</strong> was supposed<br />
to teach the principles of business and how the various functi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
worked together under competiti<strong>on</strong> to produce various results. Clarem<strong>on</strong>t<br />
made it a little more interesting by assigning a psychologist al<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
regular professor to observe the team meetings held during several hours<br />
of class time. Of course, teams spent much of their time meeting during<br />
the week out of class.<br />
This was not a course <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> taught, but the similarity to the less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
from the c<strong>on</strong>cept of the Management C<strong>on</strong>trol Panel was striking.<br />
The course was required for our doctoral program. However, like many<br />
graduate courses at Clarem<strong>on</strong>t, it could be taken for either masters or<br />
doctoral level credit. Only a few courses were reserved just for doctoral<br />
students. In any case, this particular class had <strong>on</strong>ly four of my doctoral<br />
classmates out of a class of about thirty, both masters and doctoral students.<br />
Since a team c<strong>on</strong>sisted of four students, we decided to form a team<br />
of four “aces.”<br />
We anticipated that our team would easily win the competiti<strong>on</strong><br />
between the companies. We definitely had advantages. Not <strong>on</strong>ly were we<br />
at a higher educati<strong>on</strong>al level, but at a higher managerial level as well. Of<br />
the four members of my team, I was the <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e who was not at least a<br />
corporate vice president and accustomed to making decisi<strong>on</strong>s involving all<br />
business disciplines. And I had worked <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> all functi<strong>on</strong>al areas while running<br />
a department of research and development. Only a few of the masters<br />
level students were corporate officers, and no other team had more than<br />
<strong>on</strong>e of these <strong>on</strong> their team. We had three!<br />
Despite the educati<strong>on</strong>al advantage of being doctoral students, and the<br />
advantage of this top level managerial experience, we did not easily finish<br />
as the top team in this competiti<strong>on</strong>. In fact, we did not finish as top team<br />
at all. We finished somewhere in the middle of the pack. We couldn’t figure<br />
it out. More than <strong>on</strong>ce, <strong>on</strong>e of our members would say something like,