04.03.2013 Views

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72 ■ A CLASS WITH DRUCKER<br />

■ If you were the corporate attorney, what acti<strong>on</strong>s should you take,<br />

given your lack of functi<strong>on</strong>al business knowledge and experience?<br />

■ How can senior corporate managers of any background best prepare<br />

themselves for general management resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities?<br />

After giving us time to read the case and jot down our ideas, Peter led<br />

us into a discussi<strong>on</strong> regarding the generalist versus the specialist as a successful<br />

top executive. Some of the class supported the view that the traditi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

functi<strong>on</strong>al areas were the <strong>on</strong>ly way to reach the top. However,<br />

Peter clearly felt that the traditi<strong>on</strong>al functi<strong>on</strong>al tracks to the top should<br />

be sec<strong>on</strong>dary to two other important elements in an executive’s background:<br />

past proven success and pers<strong>on</strong>al readiness for the job. Peter<br />

emphasized that any manager’s preparati<strong>on</strong> for a top job was the resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />

of the individual executive. Looking at me meaningfully, he<br />

added, “Without this preparati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>on</strong>e should not venture into unfamiliar<br />

areas unless there is no alternative.” Without pause, he then launched<br />

into what I believe was an allegorical story regarding a type of preparati<strong>on</strong><br />

he envisi<strong>on</strong>ed as effective.<br />

The Secret Life of a Top Executive<br />

I was often amazed that <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> could so easily transiti<strong>on</strong> from a lecture<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e topic to suddenly come forth <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> an absolute gem <strong>on</strong> an entirely<br />

different topic which sometimes appeared <strong>on</strong>ly tenuously c<strong>on</strong>nected to his<br />

original subject. In some cases, he might lecture for an hour <strong>on</strong> various<br />

topics which appeared not at all to be c<strong>on</strong>nected to what he was lecturing<br />

about when he began. He might do this in answer to a questi<strong>on</strong>, but at<br />

times it appeared that no special stimulus at all was required. However, if<br />

you paid close attenti<strong>on</strong> to these different mini-lectures, and even the lectures<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g>in a lecture, everything would become clear. He would tie it all<br />

together, and you understood that he felt that you needed to understand<br />

all of this extra material to get the basic point or understand his answer to<br />

a questi<strong>on</strong> that a student asked.<br />

Everything <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> said had value. I have frequently tried to go over<br />

Peter’s lectures in my mind to find some unimportant trivia or something<br />

that I could immediately dismiss or disregard. I was never able to do it. Yet<br />

his lectures ranged widely. I learned to eagerly await these sudden appearances<br />

of unexpected less<strong>on</strong>s, and I suspect others did as well.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!