04.03.2013 Views

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

A Class with Drucker - Headway | Work on yourself

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168 ■ A CLASS WITH DRUCKER<br />

explained to me by a more experienced executive recruiter, was that this<br />

was to ensure that “the chemistry is right.” “Sometimes a candidate w<strong>on</strong>’t<br />

like his potential boss,” I was told. “Sometimes, a potential boss w<strong>on</strong>’t like<br />

the candidate. And yes, there are times when neither <strong>on</strong>e will like each<br />

other. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> three to five candidates, chances are that in at least<br />

<strong>on</strong>e case the candidate will like the potential boss, and vice versa. But in all<br />

cases, the candidate must meet all the main requirements for the job.”<br />

This proved to be good advice. In <strong>on</strong>e case, I spent c<strong>on</strong>siderable time<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> a hiring executive in developing the “job specificati<strong>on</strong>s” for the positi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

One very important qualificati<strong>on</strong> in this instance was geographical<br />

experience in the area where the executive would be operating. This was<br />

necessary because of local customs and other technical requirements peculiar<br />

to the locality. I then went about my business finding the three to five<br />

candidates to present to the hiring executive.<br />

Some clients preferred to have candidates submitted and interviewed<br />

“piecemeal,” that is, as so<strong>on</strong> as each was recruited. However, some clients<br />

didn’t want to start interviewing until all the candidates had been recruited<br />

and were ready to go. I preferred the latter approach, as I thought it would<br />

give the client a better feel for the range of what was available before making<br />

a decisi<strong>on</strong> as to which candidate to extend an offer. However, just<br />

before I was ready to submit the candidates that I had recruited for this<br />

assignment, the client called off the search. “Just luck,” he said, “but<br />

some guy happened to hear that we were looking and I interviewed and<br />

hired him.”<br />

I asked to go over the job specificati<strong>on</strong>s against the individual’s qualificati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> the client, to which he agreed. Everything looked good until<br />

we got to the requirement having to do <str<strong>on</strong>g>with</str<strong>on</strong>g> geographical experience. My<br />

client became evasive. Finally, he admitted that the candidate had no experience<br />

in the geographical area whatsoever. “But it’s okay,” he said. “We’ll<br />

help him. He is so str<strong>on</strong>g in other areas that he’ll do a great job.”<br />

This was a perfect example of what <str<strong>on</strong>g>Drucker</str<strong>on</strong>g> was talking about. Here<br />

the client himself had stated that prior geographical experience was an<br />

essential requirement for any candidate. Yet he had disregarded this<br />

requirement because the candidate was str<strong>on</strong>g in some other, less essential<br />

areas. Did the new hire succeed in this instance? I really d<strong>on</strong>’t know.<br />

However, there is no questi<strong>on</strong> that his chances of succeeding were significantly<br />

reduced, because the candidate lacked what the hiring executive<br />

himself had thought through and determined as a major qualificati<strong>on</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!