26.03.2013 Views

Civil Engineering Project Management (4th Edition)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

182 <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

For UK jobs the standard method of classification is normally used because<br />

there are computer programs available to aid billing which are based on the<br />

A–Z classification. For overseas work a non-CESMM method of billing is used,<br />

which allows the classes of work adopted to follow the logical building order.<br />

Number of items. Some civil engineering bills of quantities contain upwards<br />

of a thousand items because many different types of operations over many<br />

different structures are involved. Where possible, an effort should be made to<br />

keep the number of items to no more than they need be. This helps to reduce<br />

the work involved in measurement throughout the contract; but departures<br />

from the standard method may make the estimator’s task more difficult and<br />

so should be kept to the minimum necessary.<br />

The question of how detailed the billing should be depends on the nature<br />

and size of the works. What is to be measured for payment can vary widely.<br />

For instance, in a contract for the construction of a dam, some minor gauge<br />

house might be billed as a single lump sum item; the drawings and specification<br />

providing all details of what is required. Often where there are repetitive<br />

structures, such as access chambers to valves on a pipeline, these too can be<br />

billed complete by number.<br />

In civil engineering it is quite common to bill items, such as standard doors<br />

simply by number, the specification describing what is required including<br />

the frame, priming and painting, and the type of door furniture required. If a<br />

special door is required, such as for the front entrance, again this is shown on<br />

the drawings and specified in detail; so the item in the bill appears as ‘Front<br />

entrance door … 1 No. … ’.<br />

Where methods of measurement depart from the ICE standard method, this<br />

must be made clear in the bill. Although the standard method permits the<br />

description of an individual item to make clear it is not measured according to<br />

the standard method, it is better to group such items together. Either they can be<br />

grouped under some appropriate sub-heading, or it may be decided that certain<br />

types of work throughout the bills are not to be measured according to the standard<br />

method. When this policy is adopted, a statement must appear in the preamble<br />

to the bills of quantities (see below) saying such as ‘Painting of metalwork<br />

is not measured separately and is to be included in the rate for supply and fixing<br />

of metalwork’. To prevent errors, a sub-heading before metalwork items should<br />

repeat this briefly, for example, ‘Following items including painting’.<br />

15.5 Accuracy of quantities: provisional quantities<br />

In preparing the bills, the quantities should be accurately taken off drawings<br />

in accordance with the method of measurement. The quantities billed should<br />

not contain hidden reserves by ‘over-measuring’ them when preparing a bill.<br />

There may be a temptation to do this when, for instance, billing the trench<br />

excavation for a pipeline. But if the engineer increases the length at greater<br />

depth and decreases that at shallow depth to compensate, he may give the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!