26.03.2013 Views

Civil Engineering Project Management (4th Edition)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

218 <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

adopting different methods for construction than he planned in his programme<br />

and might involve him in more cost. On the other hand, if there are several<br />

buildings, which the contractor has programmed to construct in sequence, and<br />

one of them is delayed by foundation problems, the contractor can divert his<br />

workforce to those not delayed, so there may be no need for an extension of the<br />

contract period.<br />

The resident engineer’s records are vitally important when considering delay<br />

claims. It is reasonable to allow a contractor some costs of disruption when he<br />

has to change unexpectedly from one operation to another, but it is unreasonable<br />

for him to leave his men doing nothing when there is work to get on with.<br />

Also a contractor cannot allege he is delayed by ‘late receipt of engineer’s<br />

drawings or instructions’ when he is in no position to do the work because he<br />

is behind his programme, or his plant is broken down.<br />

With respect to ‘exceptional adverse weather’ as a cause of unavoidable delay,<br />

in the UK this usually means wet weather, including flooding, holding up crucial<br />

earthwork constructions, such as embanking and road construction. A contractor<br />

normally allows about 10 per cent time for ‘lost time’ due to weather in<br />

the UK, but this depends on the nature of the works to be constructed. It should<br />

be noted that, under ICE conditions, an extension of the contract period on<br />

account of exceptional adverse weather, does not entitle a contractor to extra<br />

payment on account of the delay; though if there are items in the bill of quantities<br />

payable per week or month, such as for the maintenance of the resident<br />

engineer’s offices, these would continue to be payable for the extended contract<br />

period.<br />

The ECC conditions deal with weather by comparing actual weather conditions<br />

experienced on site, with the weather data supplied and set out in the<br />

contract. A ‘compensation event’ is then established if the weather conditions<br />

experienced can be shown to have a frequency of less than once in 10 years,<br />

that is, 1 in x years where x is greater than 10. As with all compensation events<br />

under the ECC this may lead to adjustment of both prices and time for<br />

completion.<br />

17.11 Estimating delay costs<br />

The cost which has to be evaluated due to delay to a contractor varies according<br />

to whether or not the delay justifies an extension of the contract completion<br />

period. If the delay does not justify an extension of the completion<br />

period, then the basic delay costs comprise such matters as standing time, lost<br />

time, and ‘uneconomic working’ for labour and plant. These can occur when<br />

the contractor has to stop work waiting for instructions, re-organize his work<br />

to cope with unforeseen conditions, or having to move labour and plant onto<br />

some other work available or as directed by the engineer. The ‘lost time’ by<br />

men and machines can be identified and costed, on a similar basis to that set<br />

out in Section 17.9.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!