26.03.2013 Views

Civil Engineering Project Management (4th Edition)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

194 <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

admeasurement and they need bear no relationship to actual methods the<br />

contractor uses.<br />

Under ICE Conditions (Clause 14(7)) the engineer is only required to state<br />

why a proposed method by the contractor fails to meet the contract requirements<br />

or would be detrimental to the permanent works. It is left to the contractor<br />

to decide what method he will adopt to gain the engineer’s consent.<br />

Hence, if the engineer has no reason to specify a particular method, he should<br />

avoid mentioning any lest this be interpreted as a ‘specified requirement’ as<br />

discussed above. Also acceptance of a method-related item in a contract does<br />

not imply the engineer has given his consent to the method stated. The preamble<br />

to the bill may need to make this clear.<br />

15.11 Adjustment item to the total price<br />

An adjustment item is an addition or deduction a tenderer makes to the final<br />

total of his prices entered in the bills of quantities. The CESMM permits an<br />

adjustment item as a lump sum addition or deduction, paid by instalments in<br />

the same proportion as the total payments to date, less retention, bears to the<br />

total of billed prices (see Section 16.4). The addition or deduction is not to be<br />

exceeded, and the full amount is to be allowed when a certificate of substantial<br />

completion for the whole works is issued.<br />

In contracts which do not follow the CESMM a tenderer may be free to add<br />

an adjustment item to his tender – or in fact add any additional item for which<br />

he submits a separate price. His tender is only an ‘offer’ so he is free to offer his<br />

price in any way he likes. The employer can, of course, lay down rules that he<br />

will not entertain any offer that is not priced as he instructs, but this is a rule for<br />

himself. The tenderer has to run the risk that his non-conforming tender will<br />

not be considered: but this is rather unlikely to happen if his bid is the lowest.<br />

Thus, instead of inserting a lump sum addition or deduction as required by<br />

the standard method, he can insert an adjustment item which comprises a<br />

percentage reduction (or, more rarely, addition) to be applied to all his billed<br />

prices. Sometimes this practice is actually invited by the employer who invites<br />

tenders for two separate contracts simultaneously, and provides a special item<br />

in one contract for the contractor to quote his reduction of price (if any) if he<br />

were awarded both contracts.<br />

An adjustment item as such is usually added by a tenderer when – after having<br />

had all the items in the bill priced and totalled – he looks at the final total<br />

so derived and decides to increase or decrease it. This is his commercial decision.<br />

He will have made a check estimate of the cost of the whole contract in an<br />

entirely different manner from that obtained by totalling the priced quantities<br />

in the bills. This can be done, for instance, by costing the total materials and<br />

estimated labour and plant to be used on the job, and adding a percentage<br />

for overheads and profit. In the light of his findings and taking into account<br />

other factors, such as risk, need for more work or the likely competition from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!