26.03.2013 Views

Civil Engineering Project Management (4th Edition)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Site concreting and reinforcement 253<br />

Where concrete will not remain exposed to view, minor discrepancies can be<br />

accepted. ‘Fins’ of concrete caused by the mix leaking through butt joints in the<br />

formwork should be knocked off. Shallow honeycombing should be chiselled<br />

out, and a chase cut along any defective construction joint. The cut-out area or<br />

chase should be washed, brushed with a thick cement grout, and then filled<br />

with a dryish mortar mix. This rectifying work should be done as soon as possible<br />

so the mortar mix has a better chance of bonding to the ‘green’ concrete.<br />

Shrinkage cracking of concrete is a common experience. The shrinkage of<br />

concrete due to drying is of the order of 0.2–0.5 mm/m for the first 28 days.<br />

Subsequently concrete may expand slightly when wet and shrink on drying.<br />

The coefficient of temperature expansion or contraction is very much smaller,<br />

of the order of 0.007 mm/m per degree centigrade of change. Rich concrete<br />

mixtures tend to shrink more than lean mixes. The use of large aggregate, such<br />

as 40 mm instead of 20 mm, helps to minimize shrinkage. To avoid cracking of<br />

concrete due to shrinkage, wall lengths of concrete should be limited to about<br />

9 m if restrained at the base or ends. Heavy foundations to a wall should not<br />

be allowed to stand and dry out for a long period before the wall is erected,<br />

because the wall concrete bonding to the base may be unable to shrink without<br />

cracking. Concrete is more elastic than is commonly appreciated, for example<br />

the unrestrained top of a 300 mm diameter reinforced concrete column 4 m<br />

high can be made to oscillate through nearly 1 cm by push of the hand.<br />

19.12 Handling and fixing steel reinforcement<br />

In best engineering practice the engineer will produce complete bar-bending<br />

schedules for use by the contractor. The engineer may not guarantee that such<br />

schedules are error free and may call upon the contractor to check them. But,<br />

as often as not, the contractor will fail to do this, so it is advisable for the resident<br />

engineer to check the schedules so that he can forewarn the contractor of<br />

any error present. In practice, few errors will be found because the advantage<br />

of producing bar-bending schedules is that it applies a detailed check on the<br />

validity of the reinforcement drawings supplied to the contractor.<br />

In some contracts the contractor is required to produce bar-bending schedules<br />

himself from the reinforcement drawings supplied under the contract.<br />

This is not such good practice; the engineer foregoes an opportunity to check<br />

the reinforcement drawings, and the contractor (or his reinforcement supplier)<br />

who produces the bending schedules will not necessarily be sufficiently<br />

acquainted with the design to notice some discrepancy which indicates a possible<br />

design error.<br />

Reinforcement is now seldom bent on site, except on sites overseas.<br />

Deliveries of reinforcement should be supervised by the leading steelfixer,<br />

who should check the steel against the bar schedules and direct where bars<br />

should be stocked. Bars should be delivered with identifying tags on them,<br />

but sometimes these get torn off. The leading steelfixer should not allow with-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!