Civil Engineering Project Management (4th Edition)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
248 <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
Such simple errors are not unusual and must be guarded against because they<br />
cause much perplexity and waste of time trying to discover the cause of a bad<br />
test result. The concrete must be fully compacted in the mould, which is kept<br />
under damp sacking until the next day when the mould can be removed and<br />
the cube marked for identity. It is then best stored in water at ‘room temperature’<br />
for curing until sent to the test laboratory. If poor cube test results appear<br />
on consecutive batches, an error in the cement content of batches may be<br />
suspected, or else the quality of the cement itself.<br />
Honeycombing is most usually caused by inadequate vibration or rodding<br />
of the concrete adjacent to the face of formwork. Sometimes too harsh a mix<br />
is used so there are insufficient fines to fill the trapped interstices between<br />
coarse aggregate and formwork, or the larger stones cause local arching. Sand<br />
runs – patches of sandy concrete on a wall surface which can be scraped away<br />
with a knife – can be due to over-vibration near a leaking joint in the formwork<br />
which allows cement and water to pass out of the mix. One simple, and<br />
not infrequent, cause of poor concrete is use of the wrong mix due to a ‘failure<br />
of communication’ with the batching plant operator or ready-mix supplier.<br />
An experienced concreting foreman should be able to detect a ‘wrong mix’ the<br />
moment it is discharged.<br />
19.8 Site checks on concrete quality<br />
The defect of cube and beam tests on concrete is that results cannot be known<br />
until some days after the concrete has been placed. If weak concrete appears<br />
to have been placed in a structure a difficult situation arises. The resident<br />
engineer can ask for the offending concrete to be demolished and re-built but<br />
this may pose such difficulty and delay that the decision ought not to be made<br />
on site without first discussing the problem with the engineer. The action<br />
taken depends upon how far the strength of the concrete falls short of the<br />
required strength, the load-bearing function of the under-strength concrete,<br />
and whether some alternative exists which does not involve breaking out the<br />
faulty concrete.<br />
Frequent site checks of concrete quality can help to avoid such problems.<br />
Section 19.6 has already indicated that the water content of a mix can easily be<br />
judged by eye; and if the quality of the aggregate stocks held on site is kept<br />
under reasonable supervision, defects arising from aggregate quality or water<br />
content are unlikely to arise. Thus it is to the batching plant, and more particularly<br />
to the cement content, that checks should be directed.<br />
One of the simplest on-the-spot tests which can be conducted is the density<br />
of freshly made concrete. This should be at least 2350 kg/m 3 (147 lb/ft 3 ) for a<br />
C20 mix and 2390 kg/m 3 (149 lb/ft 3 ) for a C30 mix on the assumption that the<br />
relative density of the aggregate is 2.65. The trial concrete mixes, however,<br />
should have revealed the typical densities expected for various grades of<br />
mix. The density can be obtained by filling and weighing an 0.015 m 3 (0.5 ft 3 )