26.03.2013 Views

Civil Engineering Project Management (4th Edition)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248 <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

Such simple errors are not unusual and must be guarded against because they<br />

cause much perplexity and waste of time trying to discover the cause of a bad<br />

test result. The concrete must be fully compacted in the mould, which is kept<br />

under damp sacking until the next day when the mould can be removed and<br />

the cube marked for identity. It is then best stored in water at ‘room temperature’<br />

for curing until sent to the test laboratory. If poor cube test results appear<br />

on consecutive batches, an error in the cement content of batches may be<br />

suspected, or else the quality of the cement itself.<br />

Honeycombing is most usually caused by inadequate vibration or rodding<br />

of the concrete adjacent to the face of formwork. Sometimes too harsh a mix<br />

is used so there are insufficient fines to fill the trapped interstices between<br />

coarse aggregate and formwork, or the larger stones cause local arching. Sand<br />

runs – patches of sandy concrete on a wall surface which can be scraped away<br />

with a knife – can be due to over-vibration near a leaking joint in the formwork<br />

which allows cement and water to pass out of the mix. One simple, and<br />

not infrequent, cause of poor concrete is use of the wrong mix due to a ‘failure<br />

of communication’ with the batching plant operator or ready-mix supplier.<br />

An experienced concreting foreman should be able to detect a ‘wrong mix’ the<br />

moment it is discharged.<br />

19.8 Site checks on concrete quality<br />

The defect of cube and beam tests on concrete is that results cannot be known<br />

until some days after the concrete has been placed. If weak concrete appears<br />

to have been placed in a structure a difficult situation arises. The resident<br />

engineer can ask for the offending concrete to be demolished and re-built but<br />

this may pose such difficulty and delay that the decision ought not to be made<br />

on site without first discussing the problem with the engineer. The action<br />

taken depends upon how far the strength of the concrete falls short of the<br />

required strength, the load-bearing function of the under-strength concrete,<br />

and whether some alternative exists which does not involve breaking out the<br />

faulty concrete.<br />

Frequent site checks of concrete quality can help to avoid such problems.<br />

Section 19.6 has already indicated that the water content of a mix can easily be<br />

judged by eye; and if the quality of the aggregate stocks held on site is kept<br />

under reasonable supervision, defects arising from aggregate quality or water<br />

content are unlikely to arise. Thus it is to the batching plant, and more particularly<br />

to the cement content, that checks should be directed.<br />

One of the simplest on-the-spot tests which can be conducted is the density<br />

of freshly made concrete. This should be at least 2350 kg/m 3 (147 lb/ft 3 ) for a<br />

C20 mix and 2390 kg/m 3 (149 lb/ft 3 ) for a C30 mix on the assumption that the<br />

relative density of the aggregate is 2.65. The trial concrete mixes, however,<br />

should have revealed the typical densities expected for various grades of<br />

mix. The density can be obtained by filling and weighing an 0.015 m 3 (0.5 ft 3 )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!