Civil Engineering Project Management (4th Edition)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
184 <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
should then clearly state which classes of work (i.e. ‘trades’) are not measured<br />
in accordance with the CESMM.<br />
For matters which it is usual to let out to specialist sub-contractors, such as<br />
terrazzo floorings, balustrading, ceramic tiling, etc., either lump sums can be<br />
called for if the drawings and specification define everything required, or<br />
provisional sums can be inserted.<br />
15.7 Some problems of billing<br />
Excavation<br />
Apart from excavation by dredging or for ‘cuttings’; the CESMM distinguishes<br />
only between ‘excavation for foundations’ and ‘general excavation’ (listed in<br />
that order). However, the more logical order should be adopted of billing<br />
general excavation to a stated level (the ‘final surface’ for that item) followed by<br />
excavation for foundations below the ‘final surface’ for the general excavation.<br />
This can result in items referenced ‘E400’ in accordance with CESMM, preceding<br />
those referenced ‘E300’; but these references should not be changed.<br />
If the general excavation has to be taken down to two different levels, that is<br />
to a ‘stepped’ formation, then under the CESMM method it is billed as one<br />
item to the lower of the two ‘final surface’ levels. If an attempt is made to bill<br />
it as two excavation items ‘banded horizontally’, one below the other, sundry<br />
complications occur which are best avoided as they can cause confusion. Nor<br />
should it be taken as two separate items, the depth of each being measured<br />
from ground surface, because it is not excavated in this manner when the areas<br />
are adjacent.<br />
Rock excavation has to be itemized separately from other materials, the volume<br />
of rock being measured independently. Usually neither the quantity nor<br />
the depths at which rock will be encountered will be accurately known; but the<br />
quantity should be estimated on the basis of the geophysical data available.<br />
The latter must be supplied to tenderers to permit them to make their own<br />
judgement as to the depth and extent of rock likely to be encountered.<br />
The definition of ‘rock’ presents difficulties, but it must be stated in the<br />
preamble to the bills of quantities. Geophysical data may occasionally permit<br />
a given ‘rock’ to be defined, but in most cases rock is probably best defined<br />
according to the method of excavation. Unfortunately methods for removal can<br />
vary greatly, but for specification purposes three methods can be distinguished:<br />
• use of explosives;<br />
• use of hydraulic hammers or compressed air-operated tools;<br />
• use of mechanical rippers (in open excavations).<br />
It is usual to combine the first two methods to define rock by defining them<br />
as – ‘Rock is material requiring to be loosened or broken up in situ by use of