03.04.2013 Views

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IX.—Additional Notes on Some Points in St. Basil’s Doctrinal <strong>and</strong> Ecclesiastical<br />

Position.<br />

It has been claimed with reason that the doctrinal st<strong>and</strong>point of St. Basil is identical<br />

with that of the English <strong>Church</strong>, with the one exception of the veneration of relics <strong>and</strong> the<br />

invocation of saints. 702<br />

In confirmation of this view, the following points may be noted:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> Holy Eucharist. <strong>The</strong> remarkable passage on the spiritual m<strong>and</strong>ucation of the<br />

elements in Letter VIII. is commented on on p. 118. His custom as to frequent communion<br />

<strong>and</strong> his opinion as to the reserved sacrament are remarked on on p. 179.<br />

A significant passage is to be found in the Moralia, Rule XXI., that participation in the<br />

Body <strong>and</strong> Blood of Christ is necessary to eternal life. John vi. 54, is then quoted. That no<br />

benefit is derived by him who comes to communion without consideration of the method<br />

whereby participation of the Body <strong>and</strong> Blood of Christ is given; <strong>and</strong> that he who receives<br />

unworthily is condemned. On this John vi. 54 <strong>and</strong> 62, <strong>and</strong> 1 Cor. xiii. 27, are quoted. By<br />

what method (ποί& 251· λόγῳ) we must eat the Body <strong>and</strong> drink the Blood of the Lord, in<br />

remembrance of the Lord’s obedience unto death, that they who live may no longer live<br />

unto themselves, but to Him who died <strong>and</strong> rose again for them. In answer, the quotations<br />

are Luke xxii. 29, 1 Cor. xi. 23, 2 Cor. v. 14, <strong>and</strong> 1 Cor. x. 16.<br />

2. Mariolatry. Even Letter CCCLX., which bears obvious marks of spuriousness, <strong>and</strong><br />

of proceeding from a later age, does not go beyond a recognition of the Blessed Virgin as<br />

Θεοτόκος, in which the Catholic <strong>Church</strong> is agreed, <strong>and</strong> a general invocation of apostles,<br />

prophets, <strong>and</strong> martyrs, the Virgin not being set above these. <strong>The</strong> argument of Letter CCLXI.<br />

(p. 300) that “if the Godbearing flesh was not ordained to be assumed of the lump of Adam,<br />

what need was there of the Blessed Virgin?” seems quite inconsistent with the modern<br />

doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. Of any cultus of the Virgin, St. Basil’s writings<br />

shew no trace.<br />

3. Relations to the Roman <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

In order to say something under this head, Ceillier, the Benedictine, is driven to such<br />

straits as to quote the application of the term “Coryphæus” to Damasus in Letter CCXXXIX.<br />

Certainly St. Basil saw no reason to congratulate the Westerns on their “Coryphæus,” so far<br />

as intelligent interest in the East was involved. Fialon 703 sees the position more clearly, so<br />

far as Basil is concerned, though he assumes the Councils to have given more authority to<br />

the patriarch of the ancient capital than was in fact conceded. “Si Basile ne va pas, comme<br />

la majorité du Concile de Constantinople, jusqu’à traiter l’Occident comne étranger; s’il ne<br />

pretend pas que 1’empire appartienne à l’Orient, parce que l’Orient voit naitre le Soleil, et que<br />

702 cf. Dr. Travers Smith, St. Basil, p. 125.<br />

703 Etude Hist. p. 133.<br />

Additional Notes on Some Points in St. Basil's Doctrinal <strong>and</strong> Ecclesiastical…<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!