03.04.2013 Views

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘Create in me a clean heart, O God,’ 424 not asking for another, but for the cleansing of the<br />

heart he had. And a new creature is spoken of, not as though another creation came into<br />

being, but because the enlightened are established in better works. If the Father created the<br />

Son for works, He created Him not on account of Himself, but on account of the works.<br />

But that which comes into being on account of something else, <strong>and</strong> not on its own account,<br />

is either a part of that on account of which it came into being, or is inferior. <strong>The</strong> Saviour<br />

will then be either a part of the creature, or inferior to the creature. We must underst<strong>and</strong><br />

the passage of the manhood. And it might be said that Solomon uttered these words of the<br />

same wisdom whereof the Apostle makes mention in the passage ‘For after that in the wisdom<br />

of God, the world by wisdom knew not God.’ 425 It must moreover be borne in mind that<br />

the speaker is not a prophet, but a writer of proverbs. Now proverbs are figures of other<br />

things, not the actual things which are uttered. If it was God the Son Who said, ‘<strong>The</strong> Lord<br />

created me,’ He would rather have said, ‘<strong>The</strong> Father created me.’ Nowhere did He call Him<br />

Lord, but always Father. <strong>The</strong> word ‘begot,’ then, must be understood in reference to God<br />

the Son, <strong>and</strong> the word created, in reference to Him who took on Him the form of a servant.<br />

In all these cases we do not mention two, God apart <strong>and</strong> man apart (for He was One), but<br />

in thought we take into account the nature of each. Peter had not two in his mind when he<br />

said, ‘Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh.’ 426 If, they argue, the Son is a thing begotten<br />

<strong>and</strong> not a thing made, how does Scripture say, ‘<strong>The</strong>refore let all the house of Israel know<br />

assuredly that God hath made that same Jesus, Whom ye have crucified, both Lord <strong>and</strong><br />

Christ’? 427 We must also say here that this was spoken according to the flesh about the Son<br />

of Man; just as the angel who announced the glad tidings to the shepherds says, ‘To you is<br />

born to-day a Saviour, Who is Christ the Lord.’ 428 <strong>The</strong> word ‘to-day’ could never be understood<br />

of Him Who was before the ages. This is more clearly shewn by what comes afterwards<br />

where it is said, ‘That same Jesus whom ye have crucified.’ 429 If when the Son was born 430<br />

He was then made wisdom, it is untrue that He was ‘the power of God <strong>and</strong> the wisdom of<br />

God.’ 431 His wisdom did not come into being, but existed always. And so, as though of<br />

the Father, it is said by David, ‘Be thou, God, my defender,’ 432 <strong>and</strong> again, ‘thou art become<br />

424 Ps. li. 10 καρδίαν καθαρὰν κτίσον.<br />

425 1 Cor. i. 21.<br />

426 1 Pet. iv. 1.<br />

427 Acts ii. 36.<br />

428 Luke ii. 11.<br />

429 Acts ii. 36.<br />

430 ἐγεννήθη. But it seems to refer to the birth from Mary.<br />

431 1 Cor. i. 24.<br />

432 Ps. xxxi. 2, LXX.<br />

Dogmatic.<br />

70<br />

xlii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!