03.04.2013 Views

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter XXIX.<br />

Enumeration of the illustrious men in the <strong>Church</strong> who in their writings have used the word<br />

“with.”<br />

71. In answer to the objection that the doxology in the form “with the Spirit” has no<br />

written authority, we maintain that if there is no other instance of that which is unwritten,<br />

then this must not be received. But if the greater number of our mysteries are admitted into<br />

our constitution without written authority, then, in company with the many others, let us<br />

receive this one. For I hold it apostolic to abide also by the unwritten traditions. “I praise<br />

you,” it is said, “that ye remember me in all things, <strong>and</strong> keep the ordinances as I delivered<br />

them to you;” 1308 <strong>and</strong> “Hold fast the traditions which ye have been taught whether by word,<br />

or our Epistle.” 1309 One of these traditions is the practice which is now before us, which<br />

they who ordained from the beginning, rooted firmly in the churches, delivering it to their<br />

successors, <strong>and</strong> its use through long custom advances pace by pace with time. If, as in a<br />

Court of Law, we were at a loss for documentary evidence, but were able to bring before<br />

you a large number of witnesses, would you not give your vote for our acquittal? I think<br />

so; for “at the mouth of two or three witnesses shall the matter be established.” 1310 And if<br />

we could prove clearly to you that a long period of time was in our favour, should we not<br />

have seemed to you to urge with reason that this suit ought not to be brought into court<br />

against us? For ancient dogmas inspire a certain sense of awe, venerable as they are with a<br />

hoary antiquity. I will therefore give you a list of the supporters of the word (<strong>and</strong> the time<br />

too must be taken into account in relation to what passes unquestioned). For it did not<br />

originate with us. How could it? We, in comparison with the time during which this word<br />

has been in vogue, are, to use the words of Job, “but of yesterday.” 1311 I myself, if I must<br />

speak of what concerns me individually, cherish this phrase as a legacy left me by my fathers.<br />

It was delivered to me by one 1312 who spent a long life in the service of God, <strong>and</strong> by him I<br />

was both baptized, <strong>and</strong> admitted to the ministry of the church. While examining, so far as<br />

I could, if any of the blessed men of old used the words to which objection is now made, I<br />

found many worthy of credit both on account of their early date, <strong>and</strong> also a characteristic<br />

in which they are unlike the men of to-day—because of the exactness of their knowledge.<br />

1308 1 Cor. xi. 2.<br />

1309 2 <strong>The</strong>ss. ii. 15.<br />

1310 Deut. xix. 15.<br />

1311 Job viii. 9.<br />

Enumeration of the illustrious men in the <strong>Church</strong> who in their writings have…<br />

1312 i.e. Dianius, bp. of the Cappadocian Cæsarea, who baptized St. Basil c. 357 on his return from Athens,<br />

<strong>and</strong> ordained him Reader. He was a waverer, <strong>and</strong> signed the creed of Ariminum in 359; Basil consequently left<br />

him, but speaks reverentially of him in Ep. 51.<br />

239<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!