03.04.2013 Views

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

Nicene and Post-Nicene Church Fathers Series 2 - The Still Small ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To Maximus the Philosopher.<br />

Letter IX. 1872<br />

1. Speech is really an image of mind: so I have learned to know you from your letters,<br />

just as the proverb tells us we may know “the lion from his claws.” 1873<br />

I am delighted to find that your strong inclinations lie in the direction of the first <strong>and</strong><br />

greatest of good things—love both to God <strong>and</strong> to your neighbour. Of the latter I find proof<br />

in your kindness to myself; of the former, in your zeal for knowledge. It is well known to<br />

every disciple of Christ that in these two all is contained.<br />

2. You ask for the writings of Dionysius; 1874 they did indeed reach me, <strong>and</strong> a great<br />

many they were; but I have not the books with me, <strong>and</strong> so have not sent them. My opinion<br />

is, however, as follows. I do not admire everything that is written; indeed of some things I<br />

totally disapprove. For it may be, that of the impiety of which we are now hearing so much,<br />

I mean the Anomœan, it is he, as far as I know, who first gave men the seeds. I do not trace<br />

his so doing to any mental depravity, but only to his earnest desire to resist Sabellius. I often<br />

compare him to a woodman trying to straighten some ill-grown sapling, pulling so immoderately<br />

in the opposite direction as to exceed the mean, <strong>and</strong> so dragging the plant awry on<br />

the other side. This is very much what we find to be the case with Dionysius. While vehe<br />

mently opposing the impiety of the Libyan, 1875 he is carried away unawares by his zeal into<br />

the opposite error. It would have been quite sufficient for him to have pointed out that the<br />

Father <strong>and</strong> the Son are not identical in substance, 1876 <strong>and</strong> thus to score against the blasphemer.<br />

But, in order to win an unmistakable <strong>and</strong> superabundant victory, he is not satisfied<br />

with laying down a difference of hypostases, but must needs assert also difference of sub-<br />

1872 To be ascribed to the same period as the preceding.<br />

1873 In Lucian (Hermot. 54) the proverb is traced to a story of Pheidias, who, “after a look at a claw, could<br />

tell how big the whole lion, formed in proportion would be.” A parallel Greek adage was ἐκτοῦ κρασπέδου τὸ<br />

πᾶν ὕφασμα. Vide Leutsch., Corp. Parœmiog. Græc. I. 252.<br />

1874 i.e. of Alex<strong>and</strong>ria.<br />

1875 i.e. Sabellius. Basil is the first writer who asserts his African birth. In Ep. ccvii. he is “Sabellius the<br />

Libyan.” His active life was Roman; his views popular in the Pentapolis.<br />

1876 οὐ ταυτὸν τῷ ὑποκειμένῷ. Aristotle, Metaph. vi. 3, 1, says, μάλιστα δοκεῖ εἶναι οὐσία τὸ ὑποκείμενον<br />

τὸ πρῶτον. On the distinction between ὁμοούσιος <strong>and</strong> ταυτὸν τῷ ὑποκειμένῳ, cf. Athan., Exp. Fid. ii., where<br />

the Sabellians are accused of holding an υἱοπατώρ, <strong>and</strong> Greg. Nyss answer to Eunomius, Second Book, p. 254<br />

in Schaff <strong>and</strong> Wace’s ed. Vide also Prolegg. to Athan., p. xxxi. in this series. Epiphanius says of Noetus,<br />

μονοτύπως τον αὐτὸν πατέρα καὶ Υἱ& 232·ν καὶ ἅγιον πνεῦμα…ἡγσάμενος (Hæres. lvii. 2) <strong>and</strong> of Sabellius,<br />

Δογματίζει οὗτος καὶ οἱ ἀπ᾽ αὐποῦ Σαβελλιανοὶ τὸν αὐτὸν εἶναι Πατέρα τὸν αὐτὸν Υἱ& 232·ν τὸν αὐτὸν εἶναι<br />

ἅγιον πνεῦμα, ὡς εἶναι ἐν μιᾷ ὑποστάσει τρεῖς ὀνομασίας. (Hæres. lxii. i.)<br />

To Maximus the Philosopher.<br />

386<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!