05.04.2013 Views

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Projects to streamline existing management/ administration<br />

arrangements, including where personnel efficiencies can be achieved;<br />

• Projects to improve economy and reduce inputs (such as projects to<br />

streamline or secure efficiencies in procurement <strong>of</strong> goods and<br />

services).<br />

11.6.6 Proposals would have to include descriptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project, costings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

proposal and importantly, <strong>the</strong> likely or potential outputs in terms <strong>of</strong> efficiency<br />

and in service delivery.<br />

11.6.7 The <strong>Group</strong> considers that an appropriately represented assessment panel<br />

should be established to select project applications for funding from <strong>the</strong><br />

Innovation Fund having regard to a set <strong>of</strong> criteria to be determined by <strong>the</strong><br />

Minister for <strong>the</strong> Environment, Heritage and <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Government</strong> along <strong>the</strong><br />

following lines:<br />

Recommendations:<br />

• Scope <strong>of</strong> efficiency dividend – possible savings to be generated;<br />

• Cost <strong>of</strong> project/ extent <strong>of</strong> work by local authority;<br />

• Potential wider application <strong>of</strong> measures to o<strong>the</strong>r programmes <strong>of</strong><br />

activity, and to o<strong>the</strong>r local authorities or o<strong>the</strong>r public bodies;<br />

• Innovation; and<br />

• Joint approach between local authorities and/ or local authorities and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r publicly-funded bodies.<br />

11.7.1 In summary, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Group</strong> considers that a number <strong>of</strong> reforms could be made<br />

to improve treasury management practices within local government,<br />

including securing value for money with banks. The <strong>Group</strong> also considers<br />

that <strong>the</strong> statutory requirements on local authorities to regularly place<br />

advertisements in newspapers should be revised to reflect modern<br />

communications tools and online participative methods. At a minimum local<br />

authorities should be able to publish notices in summary form and refer<br />

readers to a webpage for fur<strong>the</strong>r information. <strong>Local</strong> authorities should also<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional fees and payments made to consultants in various<br />

service areas, and make greater use <strong>of</strong> in-house expertise, <strong>of</strong> expertise<br />

available in o<strong>the</strong>r local authorities on a shared service basis, or from<br />

regional or national sources.<br />

11.7.2 Thus <strong>the</strong> <strong>Group</strong> recommends that:<br />

• Regular competitive tendering be carried out for banking services and<br />

overdrafts, and local authorities should use <strong>the</strong>ir purchasing power to<br />

procure uniform overdraft rates at national level;<br />

• The best rates available be obtained for investments/ deposits –<br />

markets should be checked regularly to ensure best rates are being<br />

obtained;<br />

• A treasury management best practice forum be established (including<br />

a mentoring system between local authorities geared towards those<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!