05.04.2013 Views

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12.3.5 The national policy direction and support for CEBs as provided by <strong>the</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Enterprise, Trade and Innovation and Enterprise Ireland<br />

would not be affected by such integration.<br />

12.4 <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Government</strong> and County/ City Development Boards<br />

12.4.1 Effective co-ordination <strong>of</strong> public services at local level is an essential<br />

element in achieving coherent publicly funded service delivery. It was<br />

against that background that multi-agency County/ City Development<br />

Boards (CDBs) were established in 2000. They are led and supported by<br />

county/ city councils and indirectly widen local government’s sphere <strong>of</strong><br />

influence in o<strong>the</strong>r areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public service, such as enterprise, training<br />

and local development. Their key role is one <strong>of</strong> influencing o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

organisations to better co-ordinate local public service delivery. CDBs have<br />

no direct executive powers and have limited financial and o<strong>the</strong>r resources.<br />

An outline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> membership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Boards is at Appendix 11.<br />

12.4.2 A 2008 review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Boards noted that while CDBs have made some<br />

progress in regard to co-ordination <strong>of</strong> local service delivery, most notably on<br />

social inclusion, <strong>the</strong>re remains a strong need for ongoing priority and<br />

commitment to CDBs by its member bodies at both national and local level.<br />

The review also made a series <strong>of</strong> recommendations to streng<strong>the</strong>n and<br />

develop <strong>the</strong> Boards (being overseen by a National CDB <strong>Group</strong> (chaired by a<br />

Minister <strong>of</strong> State). This includes having a greater focus on <strong>the</strong> co-ordination<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic activity at local level through <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> CDB<br />

economic development sub committees (now in place). In addition, both <strong>the</strong><br />

OECD <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Irish Public Service and <strong>the</strong> Task Force report<br />

‘Transforming Public Services’ recommended that <strong>the</strong> CDBs should be<br />

streng<strong>the</strong>ned and <strong>the</strong>ir co-ordination role reinforced, and that <strong>the</strong> democratic<br />

legitimacy <strong>of</strong> elected councils should be maximised in relation to <strong>the</strong> delivery<br />

<strong>of</strong> services at local level. ‘Transforming Public Services’ also suggested that<br />

CDBs be encouraged to identify specific joint service initiatives across<br />

agencies for priority implementation (see section 1.6).<br />

12.4.3 The <strong>Group</strong> recognises <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> better co-ordination <strong>of</strong> locally<br />

delivered public services. In <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current economic situation and<br />

<strong>the</strong> resultant tight constraints on resources maximum value for public<br />

funding must be achieved. At <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>the</strong> <strong>Group</strong> accepts that this<br />

presents ongoing challenges and that much more needs to be done by <strong>the</strong><br />

member agencies on <strong>the</strong> CDBs in this regard. Where progress is made by<br />

CDBs, it is <strong>of</strong>ten dependent on <strong>the</strong> commitment by individual Board<br />

members, as opposed to tangible engagement by <strong>the</strong> members’ parent<br />

agency at national level. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, engagement on <strong>the</strong> achievement<br />

<strong>of</strong> improved co-ordination is generally not systemic.<br />

12.4.4 There is relatively limited resource sharing between agencies represented<br />

on CDBs to advance <strong>the</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agreed shared goals. The<br />

incentivising <strong>of</strong> good practice is recognised as a powerful tool in influencing<br />

<strong>the</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> good outcomes. International and national experience<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!