05.04.2013 Views

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to provide services in <strong>the</strong> corporate area using a combined pool <strong>of</strong> staff<br />

could enable savings (see section 6.4 above).<br />

6.8.5 The <strong>Group</strong> recommends that a saving <strong>of</strong> 10% on <strong>the</strong> overall corporate<br />

staffing level should be targeted for local authorities operating through joint<br />

administrative areas. In addition, a 5% reduction should be targeted in<br />

those o<strong>the</strong>r local authorities that have relatively high numbers <strong>of</strong> staffing in<br />

<strong>the</strong> corporate services area.<br />

6.9 Roads<br />

6.9.1 The roads function accounts for almost 7,000 WTE staff, some 22% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

entire local government staffing level. This figure varies hugely depending<br />

on <strong>the</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local authority. For urban authorities, it can be<br />

below 10% <strong>of</strong> staff. In contrast, for rural authorities it can represent as much<br />

as 46% <strong>of</strong> total staff. Apart from <strong>the</strong> geographical area and length <strong>of</strong> road<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> county, <strong>the</strong> staffing pr<strong>of</strong>ile for roads will be driven by <strong>the</strong> scale<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maintenance requirement (driven in part by <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> terrain),<br />

as well as <strong>the</strong> operational policies and service delivery mechanisms<br />

adopted by <strong>the</strong> local authority (driven in part by <strong>the</strong> need to use direct<br />

labour). However it is clear from a comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> road per staff<br />

member that significant variances exist with, for example, Donegal<br />

managing almost twice <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> road per staff member as Mayo (see<br />

Figure 6.11). On this basis <strong>the</strong> <strong>Group</strong> suggest that significant efficiencies<br />

can be achieved leading to reductions in <strong>the</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> staffing in <strong>the</strong> roads<br />

function in a number <strong>of</strong> local authorities.<br />

6.9.2 Fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis is needed to examine <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> maintaining roads across<br />

local authorities with a view to establishing unit costs and reviewing staffing<br />

levels and operational approaches accordingly. This exercise would need<br />

to be carried out in conjunction with <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Transport and local<br />

authorities. Given that current staffing levels in <strong>the</strong> roads area vary<br />

significantly, even when allowing for county characteristics, it is reasonable<br />

to demand a significant efficiency dividend in this area. In this context, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Group</strong> considers that a reduction in overall roads staffing <strong>of</strong> 250 can be<br />

achieved (see section 10.2).<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!