05.04.2013 Views

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

Report of the Local Government Efficiency Review Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 6.8 – Staffing Pyramid – Pr<strong>of</strong>essional/ Technical, end-2009 (% <strong>of</strong> all staff)<br />

Director<br />

0.8%<br />

Senior<br />

Engineer /<br />

Planner<br />

3.8%<br />

Engineer / Planner<br />

6.5%<br />

Technician<br />

3.5%<br />

Craftworker / General Service Supervisor<br />

6.6%<br />

General Operative<br />

40.2%<br />

Source: Survey <strong>of</strong> County and City Councils, 2010<br />

• Director<br />

– Co Manager / Director <strong>of</strong> Service / Head <strong>of</strong> Finance and<br />

equivalents<br />

• Senior Engineer / Planner<br />

– Senior Engineer & Planner / Senior Exec Engineer & Planner<br />

and equivalent (e.g. County Architect / Senior Quantity<br />

Surveyor / Senior Parks Superintendent etc)<br />

• Engineer / Planner<br />

– Exec Engineer & Planner / Assistant Engineer & Planner /<br />

Graduate Engineer & Planner and equivalent (e.g. Scientific<br />

Officer / Exec Architect / Quantity Surveyor / Executive Parks<br />

Superintendent etc)<br />

• Technician<br />

– Chief Technician / Senior Exec Technician / Exec Technician<br />

/ Technician Grade 2 / Technician Grade 1<br />

• Craftworker / GSS<br />

– Mechanic / Bricklayer / Electrician / Foreman / Carpenter /<br />

Plumber / Painter / Gardener / Caretaker etc<br />

• General Operative<br />

– Driver / Ganger / Assistant Foreman / Craftsmans Mate /<br />

Chargehand / Water Caretaker (lower grades) / School &<br />

Community Wardens / Refuse Collector / Storeman / Dog<br />

Warden / Cleaner etc<br />

6.6.8 The <strong>Group</strong> considers that <strong>the</strong> spans <strong>of</strong> control at <strong>the</strong> middle levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

staffing pyramid are not sufficiently stretching, and suggests that a shift over<br />

time from middle management levels to more junior management levels<br />

would be in keeping with a drive towards greater efficiency, while<br />

maintaining service standards. By reducing administrative staffing levels <strong>of</strong><br />

senior and middle management by 15% each (some 222 Whole-Time<br />

Equivalents (WTE) for senior management, and 545 WTE for middle<br />

management) and replacing <strong>the</strong>m with <strong>the</strong> same number <strong>of</strong> staff at more<br />

junior levels, <strong>the</strong> sector should save close to €7 million in senior<br />

management costs (based on a €30,000 cost reduction for lower level staff),<br />

and over €8 million in middle management costs (based on a €15,000 cost<br />

reduction for lower level staff).<br />

6.6.9 Likewise, <strong>the</strong> spans <strong>of</strong> control for outdoor staff could be reviewed, while<br />

maintaining service standards. The levels <strong>of</strong> staff at senior engineer/ senior<br />

planner could be reduced by 15%, with an equal reduction at engineer/<br />

planner or equivalent level. The reduction in staff in this area would be<br />

<strong>of</strong>fset by an identical increase in staff at technician and/ or craftworker and<br />

general services supervisor level. Using <strong>the</strong> same rationale as for <strong>the</strong><br />

administrative area, a 15% reduction in senior management would equate to<br />

some 184 WTE staff. A €30,000 salary cost reduction for <strong>the</strong>ir replacement<br />

by lower level staff would save well over €5 million. Likewise, <strong>the</strong> reduction<br />

by 15% in <strong>the</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> staff at middle levels would equate to a saving <strong>of</strong> up<br />

to 313 WTE staff. A €15,000 salary cost reduction achieved by <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!