06.04.2013 Views

ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...

ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...

ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 INTRODUCTION/NATURAL HISTORY <strong>OF</strong> BIG THICKET<br />

provides the most biologically meaningful conception of the Big Thicket. While larger than<br />

the Traditional Thicket, McLeod’s ecological definition is much smaller than earlier, less precise<br />

delineations. This vegetationally based view treats the Big Thicket as extending from<br />

Newton County on the Louisiana border west to near Conroe in Montgomery County, and<br />

from north of Woodville in Tyler County south to northeastern Harris County near Houston<br />

(Figs. 88, 90)—an area exceeding two million acres (810,000 hectares or 3,125 square<br />

miles) (McLeod 1972). We are using McLeod’s definition of the Big Thicket as the general<br />

basis for our discussion because it is a non-arbitrary delineation based on an actual survey<br />

of the vegetation of the region.<br />

FIG.89/THE “PRIMITIVE”BIG THICKET REGION (REPRINTED FROM NATURE LOVER’S GUIDE TO THE BIG THICKET BY HOWARD PEACOCK BY PERMISSION<br />

<strong>OF</strong> THE <strong>TEXAS</strong> A&M PRESS.COPYRIGHT © 1994 BY HOWARD PEACOCK).<br />

NATURAL HISTORY <strong>OF</strong> THE BIG THICKET<br />

GENERAL DESCRIPTION <strong>OF</strong> THE VEGETATION—From a scientific standpoint, the Big Thicket, like all<br />

of the Pineywoods, is part of two broad-scale vegetational provinces: the Southeastern Mixed<br />

Forest Province and the Outer Coastal Plain Mixed Forest Province (Keys et al. 1995; Turner<br />

et al. 1999). In general, forests to the north and west of the Big Thicket, though part of the<br />

Pineywoods, “receive less precipitation, are shorter, and contain fewer tree species” (Marks &<br />

Harcombe 1981). Ecologically, McLeod (1972) considered the Big Thicket to have been originally<br />

an area of mixed mesic woodlands, and he noted that the species composition was sufficiently<br />

homogeneous to distinguish it from adjacent vegetational types. He described it as<br />

“predominantly a loblolly pine-hardwood association” and more specifically “a loblolly pinewhite<br />

oak-beech-magnolia forest, rich in an understory of both evergreen and deciduous<br />

shrubs, a variety of climbing vines, and both annual and perennial herbs.” He considered this<br />

forest to be the climax vegetation of the region and used it as the basis for his delineation of<br />

the Big Thicket (Fig. 90). He stressed the importance of the mixed hardwoods, noting that “it<br />

is the hardwood components, with their associated understory species, that define this forest<br />

type in relation to contiguous forest types.” Even though emphasizing a common vegetational<br />

association, McLeod (1972) divided the area into an “upper thicket,” to which American<br />

beech (Fagus grandifolia) is restricted, and a wetter, more poorly drained “lower thicket,”<br />

where that species is largely replaced by oaks (Quercus spp.). However, Maxine Johnston

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!