ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...
ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...
ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FIG. 39/CO2 AND TEMPERATURE RECORDS FOR THE PAST 160,000 YEARS,<br />
FROM ANTARCTIC ICE CORES AND RECENT ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENTS.<br />
REPRINTED FROM HANSEN ET AL. 1993, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY,<br />
©1993.<br />
CLIMATE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>EAST</strong> <strong>TEXAS</strong>/INTRODUCTION 73<br />
almost orange color—the next day<br />
there will be a coating of dust on cars<br />
and other objects. An example is the<br />
“mammoth dust storm of January<br />
25–26, 1965, which limited visibilities<br />
to one or two miles in such disparate<br />
locations as El Paso, San Angelo,<br />
Dallas, San Antonio, and Houston”<br />
(Bomar 1995). While irritating to the<br />
residents of East Texas, the loss of topsoil<br />
and its ecological and agricultural<br />
implications are serious issues for the<br />
western part of the state.<br />
Pollen, plant macrofossils, packrat<br />
middens, and other types of evidence<br />
demonstrate that the climate of Texas<br />
has changed substantially over the past<br />
15,000 years since the end of the last<br />
glacial period. At 15,000 years ago, the<br />
mean annual air temperature was 5° C<br />
(9° F) less than at present, and there<br />
was a more widespread forest mosaic<br />
over most of Texas, with boreal species<br />
such as Picea glauca (white spruce) in<br />
specialized microhabitats (Bryant<br />
1977; Stahle & Cleaveland 1995).<br />
Certain present-day plant distributions,<br />
such as the rare western occur-<br />
rence of plants normally found predominantly in eastern Texas, may thus reflect these past<br />
climatic conditions (see page 209). While past long-term climate change is well-documented,<br />
attention has focused recently on the possibility of future climate change in Texas due to<br />
human-induced modifications of the atmosphere (e.g., increased CO2 concentrations) and<br />
the resulting increased greenhouse effect and global warming (see e.g., Norwine et al. 1995;<br />
North et al. 1995a). While considerable controversy exists over details, there is solid evidence<br />
that global atmospheric CO2 concentrations have increased by about 31% since pre-industrial<br />
times and that this trend can be attributed primarily to human activities (e.g., fossil fuel use,<br />
land-use changes, and agriculture) (Houghton et al. 1995, 2001). In addition, over the past<br />
160,000 years there has been a strong correlation between global atmospheric CO2 concentrations<br />
and average global temperatures (Fig. 39) (Graham 1999). However, there is<br />
controversy over whether CO2 concentrations can be characterized as the cause of these previous<br />
temperature changes.<br />
Since at least 1995, scientific consensus has existed that there is “…a discernible<br />
human influence on climate” (Houghton et al. 1995). More recently, Houghton et al. (2001)<br />
have indicated that “There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed<br />
over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.” Further, Houghton et al. (2001)<br />
note that the increase in temperature during the twentieth century is probably the largest<br />
to have occurred during the past 1,000 years, and that taken together, a number of trends<br />
“illustrate a collective picture of a warming world.” However, while the data clearly show a<br />
global warming trend, there is still uncertainty about the actual cause—some authorities<br />
believe the observed warming is at least partly the result of natural climatic fluctuations<br />
rather than human activities (e.g., Grossman 2001; Lindzen 2001).