ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...
ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...
ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
198 INTRODUCTION/CONSERVATION IN BIG THICKET<br />
spearheads this effort, with the goal being to maintain the environmental qualities of the<br />
sites. This is not a wilderness approach—however, significant efforts are being made to be<br />
environmentally sensitive. Examples of areas now protected through this approach include<br />
Beef Creek Waterfall (Jasper County), Little Cow Creek (Newton County; only Texas site of<br />
the silky-camellia), a Navasota ladies’-tresses site (Jasper Co.), Peach Tree Village (Tyler<br />
County; largest remaining native prairie in the Big Thicket area), a pyramid magnolia site<br />
(Newton County), Scrappin Valley (Newton County), and Wild Azalea Canyon (Newton<br />
County). Fortunately, many of the sites of particular ecological interest are not good for growing<br />
timber (e.g., Catahoula barrens, saline prairies)—thus, setting aside such areas as Conservation<br />
Forests is a win-win proposition from the standpoint of both the company and conservationists.<br />
The company is also allowing many remaining native forest stands to naturally regenerate. These<br />
will still be working forests—trees will be harvested and the forest managed. But rather than<br />
being replaced by genetically improved loblolly pines, natural regeneration of a diversity of tree<br />
species will be allowed to occur. Further, in some areas the company is now replanting with<br />
native longleaf and also shortleaf pine. Such varied, environmentally conscious approaches<br />
are indeed refreshing and potentially quite important, particularly in light of Temple-<br />
Inland’s position as the largest owner of forest land in the state of Texas (over a million acres)<br />
(Stan Cook, pers. comm.).<br />
THE FUTURE <strong>OF</strong> THE BIG THICKET<br />
When one looks ahead at the future of Texas, it is easy to see a time when access to natural<br />
areas is even more important than at present. With rapid population growth and continued<br />
development in the state, there will be great demand by future Texans for parks, hiking trails,<br />
recreation areas, and other venues where they can escape the increasingly large and congested<br />
urban areas. The Big Thicket, with its proximity to Houston, one of the largest population<br />
centers in the state, has the potential of partially meeting this need. Likewise, the Big Thicket,<br />
with its rich diversity of habitats and large number of species, can serve as an important<br />
preserve of biological diversity. Increasing the size of the preserve to one that is both ecologically<br />
sustainable and appropriate for large numbers of potential visitors thus seems a wise<br />
investment for the future.<br />
The conservation status of the Big Thicket as of 2004 reflects some significant gains but<br />
still includes many unanswered questions and challenges. Managing a preserve of significant<br />
size takes substantial resources, which are difficult to obtain in times of increasing pressure<br />
on the federal budget. The fate of all the additional 10,766 acres (4,357 hectares) (approved<br />
but not acquired) of the Big Thicket National Preserve is still not completely settled, though<br />
federal appropriation of $3 million for fiscal year 2003 and $3.5 million for 2004 is allowing<br />
acquisition of some of the area (D. Fusco, pers. comm.). Perhaps more importantly, when<br />
considering the Big Thicket as a whole, various development pressures (urbanization, water<br />
diversion, etc.) continue to accelerate. The effects, which include fragmentation of habitats<br />
and modifications of hydrology, have potentially serious ecological consequences.<br />
Disturbingly, two recent dam proposals (enlarging the Town Bluff Dam which creates<br />
Steinhagen Lake and building Rockland Dam on the Neches River above Steinhagen Lake)<br />
could alter critically important water flows through Big Thicket National Preserve, inundate<br />
parts of a wildlife management area, and almost completely submerge Martin Dies, Jr., State<br />
Park, which protects examples of Big Thicket vegetation (Warchut 2003; National Parks<br />
Conservation Association 2004a).<br />
Possibly even more significantly, as mentioned earlier, Champion International and<br />
Louisiana-Pacific, are withdrawing from Texas with vast areas (more than 1.5 million acres)<br />
of the Big Thicket having either been sold or now for sale (National Parks Conservation<br />
Association 2004b). As a result, the buffering from development previously provided by<br />
timber company lands is in question. The large amount of land currently changing hands