06.04.2013 Views

ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...

ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...

ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORIGIN AND DIVERSITY <strong>OF</strong> <strong>EAST</strong> <strong>TEXAS</strong> <strong>FLORA</strong>/INTRODUCTION 225<br />

same species do well in the disturbed habitats of the eastern United States (Stuckey & Barkley<br />

1993). Numerous such European species entered North America at seaport cities along the<br />

Atlantic coast and spread westward across the continent (Stuckey & Barkley 1993). An excellent<br />

example of this phenomenon can be seen with Chaenorrhinum minus, dwarf snapdragon,<br />

which was first observed growing in North America in New Jersey in 1874 (Martindale 1876)<br />

and has since spread to over 30 states and nine Canadian provinces (Widrlechner 1983).<br />

In some cases, seeds were introduced with soil, sand, or rocks being used as ballast in<br />

seagoing ships; Mühlenbach (1979) discussed the role of maritime commerce in dispersal.<br />

Other currently problematic taxa were intentionally introduced as ornamentals (e.g.,<br />

Ligustrum species, privets), as windbreaks (e.g., Tamarix species, salt-cedar), as pasture (e.g.,<br />

Cynodon dactylon, Bermuda grass), or in misguided attempts at habitat improvement, erosion<br />

control, soil stabilization, etc. In yet other cases, exotics are thought to have been accidentally<br />

introduced with crop seeds (e.g., Myagrum perfoliatum), hay (e.g., Carduus nutans subsp.<br />

macrocephalus), cotton, or wool, or else are species associated with livestock yards. Still others<br />

are transported by cars, trucks, or trains (e.g., Chaenorrhinum minus—Widrlechner 1983);<br />

Mühlenbach (1979) discussed the importance of railroads as a means of dispersal.<br />

The percentage of exotics in the East Texas flora—18% as previously stated—is approximately<br />

what would be expected based on data from other parts of the United States. Elias<br />

(1977) estimated the level of exotics at 22% in the northeastern United States, and more<br />

recently Stuckey and Barkley (1993) indicated that in northeastern states the percentage of<br />

foreign species ranged from 20% to over 30%. Their data, compiled from a number of<br />

sources, showed that there are higher percentages of foreign species in those states that have<br />

been occupied the longest by non-native humans and in those that have been most extensively<br />

involved in agriculture. Some northern and western states, with less human influence<br />

and disturbance, have figures below 20%. While rather recently colonized by European settlers,<br />

East Texas has been extensively cultivated and logged. Nearly all of its habitats have been seriously<br />

altered, and numerous exotic species have arrived and become naturalized.<br />

Comparable percentages of foreign species are seen in the floras of California (17.5%),<br />

Colorado (16%), Iowa (22.3%), Kansas (17.4%), Missouri (27.7%), North Central Texas<br />

(17.7%), and North Dakota (15%) (Stuckey & Barkley 1993; Rejmánek & Randall 1994;<br />

Diggs et al. 1999; Yatskievych 1999; Yatskievych & Raveill 2001). A disturbing increase in<br />

the percentage of exotics can be seen in data from Missouri when comparing tallies from<br />

1963 (Steyermark) and 1999 (Yatskievych). During that 35 year interval, the proportion of<br />

non-native components increased from 22.8 to 27.7% (Yatskievych & Raveill 2001). A similar<br />

increase is expected to occur in East Texas.<br />

Indeed, a significant number of introduced species new to Texas have only recently<br />

(since 1997) been reported in East Texas or immediately adjacent areas (i.e., in a non-included<br />

portion of a county partly treated in this flora). Some examples are listed in Table 2. Additional<br />

exotics can be expected to become part of the East Texas flora in the future, many with serious<br />

negative consequences to the remnant native vegetation and to the Texas economy.<br />

DIVERSITY (SPECIES RICHNESS) <strong>OF</strong> THE <strong>EAST</strong> <strong>TEXAS</strong> <strong>FLORA</strong><br />

The 3,402 vascular plant species found in East Texas (slightly more than two-thirds of the<br />

total for Texas) make it particularly rich in species for its size (about 62,600 square miles or<br />

about 23% of Texas; roughly the size of Georgia). This can be put in perspective when it is<br />

realized that the vascular plant flora of the entire Great Plains (which make up one-fifth of<br />

the area of the contiguous United States) consists of 3,067 taxa (Great Plains Flora<br />

Association 1977, 1986; Thorne 1993d). When the entire flora of North America north of<br />

Mexico is considered (estimated at approximately 18,000 species—Thorne 1993d), East<br />

Texas includes about one out of every six plant species known in the continental United<br />

States and Canada. Likewise, when the number of species in three adjacent states, Arkansas

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!