ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...
ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...
ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS - Brit - Botanical Research ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ORIGIN AND DIVERSITY <strong>OF</strong> <strong>EAST</strong> <strong>TEXAS</strong> <strong>FLORA</strong>/INTRODUCTION 225<br />
same species do well in the disturbed habitats of the eastern United States (Stuckey & Barkley<br />
1993). Numerous such European species entered North America at seaport cities along the<br />
Atlantic coast and spread westward across the continent (Stuckey & Barkley 1993). An excellent<br />
example of this phenomenon can be seen with Chaenorrhinum minus, dwarf snapdragon,<br />
which was first observed growing in North America in New Jersey in 1874 (Martindale 1876)<br />
and has since spread to over 30 states and nine Canadian provinces (Widrlechner 1983).<br />
In some cases, seeds were introduced with soil, sand, or rocks being used as ballast in<br />
seagoing ships; Mühlenbach (1979) discussed the role of maritime commerce in dispersal.<br />
Other currently problematic taxa were intentionally introduced as ornamentals (e.g.,<br />
Ligustrum species, privets), as windbreaks (e.g., Tamarix species, salt-cedar), as pasture (e.g.,<br />
Cynodon dactylon, Bermuda grass), or in misguided attempts at habitat improvement, erosion<br />
control, soil stabilization, etc. In yet other cases, exotics are thought to have been accidentally<br />
introduced with crop seeds (e.g., Myagrum perfoliatum), hay (e.g., Carduus nutans subsp.<br />
macrocephalus), cotton, or wool, or else are species associated with livestock yards. Still others<br />
are transported by cars, trucks, or trains (e.g., Chaenorrhinum minus—Widrlechner 1983);<br />
Mühlenbach (1979) discussed the importance of railroads as a means of dispersal.<br />
The percentage of exotics in the East Texas flora—18% as previously stated—is approximately<br />
what would be expected based on data from other parts of the United States. Elias<br />
(1977) estimated the level of exotics at 22% in the northeastern United States, and more<br />
recently Stuckey and Barkley (1993) indicated that in northeastern states the percentage of<br />
foreign species ranged from 20% to over 30%. Their data, compiled from a number of<br />
sources, showed that there are higher percentages of foreign species in those states that have<br />
been occupied the longest by non-native humans and in those that have been most extensively<br />
involved in agriculture. Some northern and western states, with less human influence<br />
and disturbance, have figures below 20%. While rather recently colonized by European settlers,<br />
East Texas has been extensively cultivated and logged. Nearly all of its habitats have been seriously<br />
altered, and numerous exotic species have arrived and become naturalized.<br />
Comparable percentages of foreign species are seen in the floras of California (17.5%),<br />
Colorado (16%), Iowa (22.3%), Kansas (17.4%), Missouri (27.7%), North Central Texas<br />
(17.7%), and North Dakota (15%) (Stuckey & Barkley 1993; Rejmánek & Randall 1994;<br />
Diggs et al. 1999; Yatskievych 1999; Yatskievych & Raveill 2001). A disturbing increase in<br />
the percentage of exotics can be seen in data from Missouri when comparing tallies from<br />
1963 (Steyermark) and 1999 (Yatskievych). During that 35 year interval, the proportion of<br />
non-native components increased from 22.8 to 27.7% (Yatskievych & Raveill 2001). A similar<br />
increase is expected to occur in East Texas.<br />
Indeed, a significant number of introduced species new to Texas have only recently<br />
(since 1997) been reported in East Texas or immediately adjacent areas (i.e., in a non-included<br />
portion of a county partly treated in this flora). Some examples are listed in Table 2. Additional<br />
exotics can be expected to become part of the East Texas flora in the future, many with serious<br />
negative consequences to the remnant native vegetation and to the Texas economy.<br />
DIVERSITY (SPECIES RICHNESS) <strong>OF</strong> THE <strong>EAST</strong> <strong>TEXAS</strong> <strong>FLORA</strong><br />
The 3,402 vascular plant species found in East Texas (slightly more than two-thirds of the<br />
total for Texas) make it particularly rich in species for its size (about 62,600 square miles or<br />
about 23% of Texas; roughly the size of Georgia). This can be put in perspective when it is<br />
realized that the vascular plant flora of the entire Great Plains (which make up one-fifth of<br />
the area of the contiguous United States) consists of 3,067 taxa (Great Plains Flora<br />
Association 1977, 1986; Thorne 1993d). When the entire flora of North America north of<br />
Mexico is considered (estimated at approximately 18,000 species—Thorne 1993d), East<br />
Texas includes about one out of every six plant species known in the continental United<br />
States and Canada. Likewise, when the number of species in three adjacent states, Arkansas