06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Taking The OFFensiVe 1942–45<br />

across the main lines of sea communications between the United States and Australia.<br />

While the fighting raged, Allied offensive capabilities based in Australia were growing.<br />

The obvious weapon for the IJN to apply to the problem of slowing this build-up was<br />

its submarine force. It had large, fast and well-armed boats with the endurance for the<br />

long-distance patrols required in the Pacific. Submarine crews were an elite force, and<br />

the prestige of the Sixth (submarine) Fleet was high. Moreover, Japanese submarine<br />

torpedoes were superior to any similar Allied weapon, and had been well proven in<br />

exercises before the war. If they had been deployed effectively, the 62 boats with which<br />

the IJN started the war could have defeated the ill-prepared and shorthanded Allied<br />

ASW effort in the SWPA. 308<br />

However, and fortunately for the Allies, the Japanese never engaged in the kind<br />

of strategic warfare against Allied economic targets that their Axis partners in the<br />

Kriegsmarine waged. 309 This was a direct outcome of the Japanese strategic concept<br />

of ‘decisive battle’. IJN submarines were first and foremost fleet units, with the roles<br />

of intelligence collection, scouting and harassment of USN major units to weaken<br />

and demoralise the Americans before they encountered the might of the Combined<br />

Fleet. 310<br />

This doctrine had three important consequences for Allied ASW forces. The first was<br />

that the IJN admirals regarded their boats as high-value units and were not keen that<br />

they should be risked in attacking merchant ships. 311 Second, relatively few submarines<br />

could be sent on extended anti-shipping patrols because of the need to have them<br />

available in case an occasion for decisive battle arose. Third, and as a direct result<br />

of the first two, Japanese submarine captains were relatively cautious and unskilled<br />

in their anti-commerce task. Nevertheless, in the Allied condition of 1942 following<br />

the loss of the Malay Barrier, and while the war of attrition raged in the Solomons,<br />

Japanese submarines were a serious and urgent threat to shipping off the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

east coast. 312 Map 11, an amalgam of information from several sources prepared by<br />

the author, depicts the submarine attacks recorded on shipping off the <strong>Australian</strong> east<br />

coast in 1942 and 1943.<br />

Responsibility for protecting shipping in the SWPA resided with CSWPSF, who directed<br />

the operation of the convoy system, assigned escorts and requested cooperative air<br />

cover from Commander Allied Air Forces. Importantly, as CNS, he also fulfilled the<br />

role of ‘raising, training and maintaining’ the <strong>Australian</strong> contribution to the ASW<br />

escort force, and in 1942 this was no sinecure. The principal problem was a major<br />

shortage of escorts. There were enormous calls on the few ships available to support<br />

Allied troops fighting in Papua, New Guinea and Timor, to convoy coastal shipping<br />

and to participate in Allied offensive operations. 313 The <strong>Australian</strong> shipbuilding<br />

program was just beginning to show results, the United States similarly had yet to<br />

reap the benefits of its massive industrial mobilisation, and there was no possibility<br />

of reinforcement from the hard-pressed British. Shipments of vital electronic systems<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!