06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROPPing uP a dOMinO: VieTnaM 1967–71<br />

control foreign access to sensitive national material with a high degree of confidence.<br />

However, in wartime operations, where foreign units were to be interchangeable with<br />

USN ships and needed to use the same kinds of information to be effective, segregation<br />

of NOFORN information would be difficult to effect with certainty. The USN in general,<br />

and the 7th Fleet in particular, had many programs of which the <strong>Australian</strong>s had no<br />

‘need to know’. At issue was the protection of this sensitive information.<br />

The matter received high-level USN consideration and, in the end, all the information<br />

the RAN ships would need to fulfill their foreseen responsibilities was released. 783<br />

There were also changes necessary to USN communications arrangements, with<br />

NOFORN messages needing to be off-line encrypted for transmission on the fleet<br />

broadcasts monitored by the <strong>Australian</strong> ships. RAN commanding officers reported<br />

few information release problems, and the USN demonstrated a remarkable degree<br />

of trust in the <strong>Australian</strong>s. 784<br />

On the RAN side, some effort was required to bring the ships deploying to a state of<br />

training commensurate with their future tasks. Key areas of concentration in the workup<br />

of the ships were damage control and NGS, which required that RAN procedures<br />

be modified to equate with those employed in 7th Fleet. 785 Remarkably, little attention<br />

was paid to providing the RAN ships’ companies with an understanding of the politicomilitary<br />

background to the war.<br />

It wasn’t just fine ships the 7th Fleet gained. The guided missile destroyers were the<br />

‘first eleven’ of the RAN, and their commanding officers and key members of the ships’<br />

companies were specially chosen for these postings. All but one of the Vietnam-era<br />

commanding officers made flag rank, and one became CNS. In the 7th Fleet, USN<br />

escorts frequently had junior commanders in their first command, which they held<br />

for only one year. During this time they had to distinguish themselves — theirs was<br />

a 600-plus ship navy, after all. The RAN commanding officers had more respect for<br />

the enemy, and a great deal more regard for the relative value of their ships over the<br />

transient requirements of a spotter ashore. 786<br />

Operation sea dRagOn — action north of the dMZ<br />

The United States had considered a blockade of North Vietnam as early as August<br />

1961, but the proposal met opposition from CINCPAC. 787 However, on 15 October 1966<br />

approval was given to conduct attacks on suspected WBLCs north of the DMZ, and<br />

destroyers were assigned for this purpose. The northern limit of the SEA DRAGON<br />

interdiction zone was advanced to 18° North in November 1966 and to 20° north in<br />

February 1967, and then withdrawn to 19° North in April 1968. 788 Map 27, based on<br />

Grey, Up Top, shows the SEA DRAGON area of operations. Because of the probability<br />

of coastal defences returning fire on Allied units, ships assigned would, preferably,<br />

243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!