06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Taking The OFFensiVe 1942–45<br />

to prevent landings by positioning underwater obstructions also had to be identified<br />

and marked for removal prior to the landing. In most cases, these operations had to<br />

be conducted in sight of an enemy-held coast, and with the constant threat of air and<br />

coastal battery attack on the surveying vessels. 352<br />

Extensive use was made of the photo-reconnaissance technique pioneered by the RAN<br />

Hydrographic Department. While photographic interpretation could provide accurate<br />

landform information and an indication of the extent of shallows and hazards in waters<br />

close to the beach, the technique was ineffective in waters deeper than a few metres<br />

and could not provide accurate information on the nature of the beach itself. Deeper<br />

waters had to be surveyed, while a personal inspection of the beaches to provide<br />

gradients, firm going for vehicles and machines, and debouchments from the beach<br />

was normally required. 353 As the war progressed, aerial photography was steadily<br />

supplemented by periscope photography from submarines, while AIB was tasked to<br />

make the physical inspections in advance of landings.<br />

Accordingly, the survey and hydrographic force became an integral part of amphibious<br />

operations as the war progressed. This required more ships than the Hydrographic<br />

Branch possessed, even though it had acquired a number of small civilian craft to<br />

augment its capabilities inshore, so the decision was taken to equip some of the<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> Corvettes (AMS) for surveying duties. This was a significant indication of<br />

the importance the Allies attached to the hydrographic effort when, as described in<br />

the previous section, CSWPSF was crying out for escorts for ASW duties. There were<br />

several advantages to this approach, not least that the ships were armed and could<br />

provide an element of self-defence; another was that the corvettes were sonar-fitted.<br />

Using this sensor, and with their Oropesa mine sweeps set for a minimum depth,<br />

check sweeps could be carried out rapidly along routes scheduled to be used for the<br />

approaches to an amphibious objective. The first such deployment by HMAS Whyalla,<br />

in January 1943, fully opened the route from Milne Bay to Oro Bay, thus assisting in<br />

the capture of Buna the following month. 354<br />

On 21 June 1943, the seven RAN survey ships were formed into TG 70.5 to undertake<br />

the task of surveying and charting operations for the US 7th Fleet in the SWPA. The<br />

Officer Commanding RAN Hydrographic Branch became Commander Task Group (CTG),<br />

and was appointed Charting Authority for Allied Naval Forces SWPA. The task group<br />

was soon to be joined by 11 USN ships, but the CTG remained an <strong>Australian</strong>. In the<br />

same month, two new AMS specially configured for hydrographic work, HMAS Ships<br />

Shepparton and Benalla, surveyed a route for the landing on Kiriwina Island, the first<br />

pre-assault survey in the SWPA. This unopposed landing was used to test theories and<br />

to identify areas requiring attention. One such lesson was the need for survey vessels to<br />

pilot amphibious forces to their beaches because of ‘the meagre navigational facilities<br />

of the amphibious craft, the inexperience of the personnel and the incomplete surveys<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!