06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

306 <strong>Missing</strong> <strong>Pieces</strong><br />

179 AWM 69, Item 23/22 — Allied Naval Command in the Far East.<br />

180 NAA A3300, Item 219 — Directive to ABDACOM.<br />

181 NAA MP1049/5, Item 1804/2/44 — SWPA — ABDA organisation, report VK/INT/119 of 26<br />

January 1942, contains the whole staff organisation of ABDAFLOAT and intelligence staff<br />

details.<br />

182 Collins, As Luck Would Have It, p. 107<br />

183 NAA MP1185/8, Item 1877/17/19 — Reports of Information Gathered by RANLO Batavia.<br />

184 AWM 124, Item 4/158 — Messages from ABDACOM East Indies, cable 01113 of 12 February<br />

1942, from by CGS Dill to Casey in London, shows that the British were certainly supplying<br />

ABDACOM with ULTRA. The COIC sitrep of 23 January 1942 has a supplement titled<br />

‘Japanese naval dispositions’, providing a comprehensive (and largely accurate view) of<br />

the IJN order of battle and their estimated positions. The size of Japanese submarines was,<br />

however, underestimated. The supplement is obviously an amalgam of British, <strong>Australian</strong><br />

and US intelligence and carries the security warning: ‘As this report is based on information<br />

derived from sources which, if compromised, cannot be replaced, it is requested that the<br />

distribution be restricted to an absolute minimum’.<br />

185 AWM 124, Item 4/292/VK/INT/108—NLO Batavia. Kennedy reported that the NEI<br />

Coastwatcher scheme had come ‘too late’.<br />

186 Gill, <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Navy</strong>, 1939—1942, pp. 490—491.<br />

187 NAA MP1185/8, Item 1932/2/2 — Battle of Java—<strong>Navy</strong> Office account.<br />

188 In his war diary Collins observed that: ‘It was considered unwise to keep them in the West<br />

Java Sea any longer in view of the ever increasing air activity and the weak Allied fighter<br />

protection which could be provided’. The elderly British D class cruisers were no match for<br />

any of the IJN cruisers they were likely to encounter. [NAA MP 1185/8, Item 2026/7/457<br />

— China Force.]<br />

189 Whiting commented that the NEI Army in Jakarta had an air reconnaissance report at 1700<br />

of a large enemy force 100 miles north of Sunda Strait, but this was not passed to the naval<br />

headquarters in the same building. Whiting also quoted a sighting allegedly made by an<br />

RAAF bomber of a large convoy in the Thousand Islands area to the north of Jakarta earlier<br />

on 28 February. [Brendan Whiting, Ship of Courage: The Epic Story of HMAS Perth and Her<br />

Crew, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1994, pp. 85-86.] The author has found no evidence to support<br />

either claim, but Whiting may still be correct. Jakarta was on the point of evacuation by<br />

naval forces and a message from a MLD aircraft might have been missed in the port and<br />

intercepted by RecGroup Bandung. A RAAF Hudson would also have signalled its sighting<br />

to RecGroup. Army HQ in Jakarta might have received a retransmitted report from COIC<br />

Bandung. However, if that was the case, it is odd that neither Helfrich nor his RN chief of<br />

staff knew of the report. Winslow made the same claim, and pondered how this report did<br />

not reach naval authorities. [WG Winslow, The Ghost that Died at Sunda Strait, Naval Institute<br />

Press, Annapolis, Md, 1994, pp. 131—132.] Intelligence reports about Japanese sightings<br />

were still being sent to Allied units some days after Waller and his force were lost.<br />

190 The Japanese stated that there were two light cruisers and nine destroyers in the convoy<br />

escort, reinforced around 0100 on 1 March by two heavy cruisers and a destroyer. Perth<br />

was not sunk until 0140. [AWM69, Item 67 — Japanese Strategy (A translation of document<br />

no. 15686, received by ATIS on 28 March 1946 and issued by Supreme Commander Allied<br />

Powers as ‘The Battle of the Java Sea’).]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!