06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPeRaTiOns againsT iTaly, Vichy FRance and geRMany 1939–42<br />

The loss of Sydney with all hands would suggest a negative response but, despite the<br />

high cost, Kormoran was indeed sunk. Sydney’s fate, and other incidents during HSK<br />

interceptions, prompted the Admiralty to issue a reminder to its ships about methods<br />

of eliminating doubt about the identities assumed by raiders, and the procedure to be<br />

used in challenging them. It also warned commanding officers about underestimating<br />

the fighting power of HSKs. This suggests that the Admiralty view was that Burnett<br />

and his team had not used the intelligence at their disposal appropriately. 113<br />

More than a year later, Adelaide escorting a convoy well off the West <strong>Australian</strong> coast<br />

encountered a suspicious ship. Unable to get confirmation of its claimed identity from<br />

the VESCAR system ashore, Adelaide remained at a safe range while the command<br />

team determined from the identification cards that the ship was possibly the German<br />

blockade-runner Ramses. The suspect appeared to be preparing to scuttle, at which stage<br />

Adelaide opened fire, fearing that it was a ruse de guerre preparatory to launching an<br />

attack on her. The ship sank shortly afterwards, and survivors confirmed its identity<br />

as Ramses. Adelaide had not known that she was not faced with an HSK, but had used<br />

her intelligence resources correctly to prevent any recurrence of the fates of the British<br />

armed merchant cruisers and Sydney. Her commanding officer made specific reference<br />

to the value and accuracy of the ‘German Armoured Merchant Ships’ identification<br />

pack. 114<br />

It was superior intelligence that defeated the raider threat world-wide. From a standing<br />

start in 1940, by late 1941 there was sufficient information available to any cruiser<br />

commanding officer to make appropriate decisions about closing suspicious merchant<br />

ships, especially those that did not appear on the weekly VESCAR message for their<br />

area. In all probability, it was not a shortage of intelligence but rather possible confusion<br />

about the appropriate actions to be taken on detecting an HSK that caused incidents<br />

such as the loss of Sydney.<br />

Outcomes<br />

The action against MV Romolo revealed serious shortcomings in strategic and<br />

operational intelligence, air reconnaissance and the coordination of air and naval<br />

operations. Spurgeon’s intelligence jigsaw had many missing pieces, and it was his<br />

professionalism which led to the interception and sinking rather than the operational<br />

planning and intelligence support given by <strong>Navy</strong> Office.<br />

Collins and his command team used background intelligence on their enemy, rather<br />

than the meagre intelligence they had on Italian <strong>Navy</strong> dispositions, to good effect off<br />

Cape Spada. They were, of course, operating in a completely different milieu, where<br />

the Mediterranean Fleet Commander led by example and encouraged his officers to<br />

use their initiative. By hypothesising the very worst case for the destroyers under his<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!