06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Taking The OFFensiVe 1942–45<br />

In the end, JAYWICK succeeded because of the raiding team’s tenacity and courage<br />

and Krait’s provenance, together with the cautious policies Carse adopted to avoid<br />

being sighted. The laxity or absence of Japanese patrols, about which Intelligence had<br />

been able to say nothing, also aided their approach and escape. It was an operation<br />

carried out despite the lack of intelligence on the enemy, the man-made and natural<br />

hazards that the raid could expect to encounter, and the target itself. Intelligence<br />

was either unavailable, was not made available, or was not applied correctly by the<br />

mission planners. Any oversight of the mission by DNI Long or his staff also failed to<br />

detect these gaps and errors. The operation’s intelligence jigsaw was missing many<br />

of its important pieces.<br />

A sad footnote to the success of JAYWICK is that the operation’s much more ambitious<br />

and well-equipped follow-up exploit, Operation RIMAU in October 1944, failed utterly.<br />

The raiders were compromised by their attack on a Malayan Auxiliary Police post before<br />

launching their raid, and all personnel, including the leader Lyon, then a lieutenant<br />

colonel, were either killed or captured, and later executed by the Japanese. The failure<br />

of the expedition was detected in Sigint.<br />

Task Force 74 at Biak, June 1944<br />

Opportunities for fleet actions occurred rarely in the SWPA. While there was intense<br />

sea-fighting in the neighbouring Central and South Pacific Command areas in and<br />

around the Solomons, neither the IJN Fourth Fleet nor the Allied 7th Fleet had the naval<br />

forces with which to confront each other. This situation continued until the middle of<br />

1944, when the Allied amphibious assault on Biak Island at the western extremity of<br />

the island of New Guinea brought SWPA to the attention of the IJN Combined Fleet.<br />

The operational commander at the scene was Rear Admiral Victor Crutchley, RN, as<br />

CTF 74. His first experience of engaging a Japanese surface force had been at Savo<br />

Island, where the honours went decisively to the IJN. Another opportunity loomed<br />

in 1943 when his Task Force was loaned to SOPAC to make up for some of the US<br />

cruisers lost in dislodging the Japanese from the Solomons and Bougainville. However,<br />

the Japanese force was defeated before he arrived. His final opportunity was to be at<br />

Biak in June 1944. 399<br />

The transformation of the battered remnants of TF 44 at Savo into the confident TF<br />

74 which faced the Japanese at Biak is not only a tribute to Crutchley’s drive and<br />

personality but also the developments in naval tactics. The use of technology and the<br />

growth in the support provided by intelligence to operational commanders made great<br />

strides in the two years between the encounters. As recounted in Chapter 3, Crutchley<br />

had been RACAS for a mere eight weeks when he and his force were thrust into<br />

Operation WATCHTOWER at Guadalcanal. The Battle of Savo Island yielded startling<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!