06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

270 <strong>Missing</strong> <strong>Pieces</strong><br />

responsibility affected the ability of TG 95.1 to support the left flank of the UN armies.<br />

It would appear that senior US decision making was not always in accordance with<br />

intelligence, with the prolongation of Operation HAN as one example. USN surprise at<br />

the sophistication of the mine threat posed by the NKPA reflects poorly on either the<br />

quality of intelligence on the threat or the planning respect it was given. The degree of<br />

importance accorded to ASW at the expense of other more productive tasks suggests<br />

a similar shortfall in intelligence on Soviet or Chinese intentions and capabilities, or<br />

its application to operations. 853<br />

Research suggests that neither Australia nor the RAN made any attempt to assist<br />

its ships or the United Nations generally with the collection or dissemination of<br />

intelligence in Korea. The shortage of intelligence specialists on CTG 95.1’s staff offered<br />

the RAN an opportunity to contribute and learn. This lost opportunity set a trend for<br />

the RAN’s attitude towards collecting and providing intelligence to its operational<br />

commanders. 854<br />

The RAN contribution to the struggle against the MRLA during the Malayan Emergency<br />

was as slight as the intelligence support provided. Naval forces were not deeply<br />

engaged in security force operations, and <strong>Australian</strong> units only participated under the<br />

umbrella of the FESR, which had been established to confront perceived Communist<br />

expansion into Southeast Asia. This perception was fed by reporting from <strong>Australian</strong><br />

indigenous agencies and those of its allies and partners in a series of collective defence<br />

arrangements born in the early 1950s. The impact of coalition intelligence on naval<br />

circles had its effect on the RAN by requiring the development of structures, material<br />

and tactics to conduct ASW operations in defence of Allied trade routes in the region.<br />

This capability was never deployed operationally, and was at the expense of others<br />

that would prove of more immediate value in further regional conflicts. 855<br />

Principally through the JIB, the <strong>Australian</strong> Government and Defence were kept informed<br />

on the slide of relations between Malaysia and Indonesia towards Confrontation. The<br />

government was concerned that while supporting Malaysia it should not create an<br />

enemy of Indonesia, and found the deteriorating situation in South Vietnam, a ‘protocol<br />

state’ under the Manila Treaty, an equally pressing issue and a harbinger of the ‘domino<br />

theory’ in practice. The RAN units deployed to Confrontation were ‘second tier’ and,<br />

in the case of the minesweepers, operating well outside the operational envelope for<br />

which they were designed, equipped and trained. 856<br />

Confrontation was the first campaign fought under the new British concept of joint<br />

operations and integrated staffs. Personnel from all three services manned both Plans<br />

and Intelligence staffs, and although RAN officers served in the Plans Division of this<br />

HQ, none were seconded to the Joint Intelligence Staff. Units under CinCFE’s command<br />

enjoyed intelligence support that melded contributions from all sources, including<br />

Sigint. Australia contributed directly through its Sigint resources in Australia and<br />

Singapore. These sources, plus the quality of human intelligence gathered at grassroots

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!