06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

164 <strong>Missing</strong> <strong>Pieces</strong><br />

Chongjin, and the defence of the South Korean base on the island of Yang Do, northeast<br />

of Songjin. 517 Before her arrival, an unsuccessful attempt had been made from the<br />

mainland to capture the latter. As CTG,Warramunga had one US destroyer-minesweeper<br />

and several ROK <strong>Navy</strong> minesweepers under her command, and her main duties were to<br />

interdict coastal transport, bombard targets in Songjin and Chongjin and offer support<br />

to the Yang Do Koreans. 518 There was an ROK <strong>Navy</strong> patrol boat base at Yang Do, but it<br />

is not clear that these units were also part of TG 95.22.<br />

The issues confronting the Warramunga command team, apart from the weather, which<br />

was extremely cold and snowy, were the disruption of enemy rail traffic, the location<br />

and destruction of enemy coastal batteries and the effective surveillance of the four<br />

kilometre-wide channel between Yang Do and the mainland. 519 Mines were a potential<br />

problem in the Yang Do channel, and there were numerous shore batteries protecting<br />

her two target ports. A large number of railway tunnels in which Communist trains<br />

could shelter from naval interdiction were strung along the coastline.<br />

The intelligence Warramunga had to support her operations was varied and of differing<br />

quality. First, her command team had been briefed by FO2ICFES intelligence staff at<br />

Sasebo before sailing, giving them the benefit of nearly a year’s experience gained by<br />

the UN on this length of coastline. This provided the locations of worthwhile targets,<br />

enemy gun positions and vulnerable communications links. 520 Thus, on 1 March<br />

Warramunga was able to demolish a vulnerable railway bridge that had been repaired<br />

by ‘cribbing’ supports out of sleepers. Second, chart inaccuracy was not an issue, and<br />

the conventional wisdom was that no mines could be expected in waters deeper than<br />

180 metres. This advice, naturally, applied to moored and influence (ground) mines.<br />

Drifting mines were another issue, as Soviet designs did not deactivate when their<br />

mooring cables parted. 521 Third, the command team would have expected no surface<br />

opposition, with the possible exception of armed junks. Air attack was also unlikely,<br />

with the carriers of TF 77 and their combat air patrols only 60nm to the east. By 1952,<br />

with armistice talks underway at Panmunjom, the possibility of submarine attack could<br />

only be regarded as remote.<br />

Warramunga was aware of the US carriers to seaward and of the UN units in her<br />

vicinity. 522 Because of the constant changing of units assigned to the Northern Patrol,<br />

the command team would not have been familiar with the calibre or capabilities of these<br />

ships. There were also communications difficulties, apparently caused by the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

ship’s lack of the US codebooks used within the Task Element (TE) of the task force.<br />

Nevertheless, a way was found around this problem and the TE went about its duties with<br />

apparent success. Warramunga and the destroyer USS Doyle bombarded Chongjin on<br />

2 and 3 March, the first attack involved Warramunga in an artillery duel with a North<br />

Korean battery of five guns at ranges between three and five nm. This was a spirited<br />

encounter, with the destroyer withdrawing stern first to present the smallest (and most<br />

dangerous) target to the Korean guns. 523 The Yang Do channel was kept swept of mines,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!