06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

nOTes<br />

London, 2000, p. 226. Statement attributed to Chin at a workshop held at the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

National University, Canberra on 22 and 23 February 1999.<br />

610 Donald Mackay, The Malayan Emergency 1948—60: The Domino That Stood, Brassey’s, London, 1997,<br />

p. 106.<br />

611 Smith, Counter Insurgency, p. 35.<br />

612 Chin, My Side of History, pp. 351 and 327.<br />

613 NAA A816, Item 6/301/650 — Report on Malaya by <strong>Australian</strong> Military Mission to Malaya<br />

July—August 1950 of 11 September 1950, p. 46.<br />

614 NAA MP1185/10, Item 5219/53/4 — Urgent Military Preparations Required in Malaya.<br />

615 NAA A2031, Item Vol. 33 — Defence Committee Original Minutes 176—273, Minute 20/50 of<br />

16 October 1950.<br />

616 NAA MP1185/10, Item 5245/22/10 — Strategic Reserve — Programme of Action, Secretary<br />

of Defence letter unnumbered of 8 June 1955 to the Secretary of the <strong>Navy</strong>.<br />

617 NAA A2031/8, Item 4/1956 — ANZAM Defence Committee Memorandum 4/1956.<br />

618 NAA A816/56, Item 19/321/3Y — FESR Directives to HMA Ships, 1956.<br />

619 UKNA ADM 1/23646 — HMS Alacrity Report of Proceedings Period 26 April—8 May 1952.<br />

620 A Ministry of Defence Minute of 13 November 1951 noted that one frigate, six minesweepers<br />

and two motor launches were engaged, with additional forces being raised by the Malayan<br />

Government. The estimated annual cost of the operations was £600,000. [UKNA DEFE<br />

7/240—Malaya: Defence Expenditure.]<br />

621 AWM78, Item 34/4 — HMAS Anzac Reports of Proceedings 1956, September 1956.<br />

622 AWM78, Item 298/5 — HMAS Queenborough Reports of Proceedings 1956—57, January<br />

1957.<br />

623 Short, The Communist Insurrection, pp. 371—372. Grove noted that this activity was ‘fairly<br />

constant’ but agreed with Short that many of the missions were in the nature of harassment.<br />

[Eric J Grove, Vanguard to Trident: British Naval Policy Since World War II, The Bodley Head,<br />

London, 1987, pp. 150—151.]<br />

624 Other forces involved included three infantry battalions, seven special units (jungle-trained<br />

police patrols) and a force of ex-CTs. The operation was successful, not so much in killing<br />

CTs but in breaking their morale and persuading them to surrender. [Short, The Communist<br />

Insurrection, pp. 489—492.]<br />

625 Photo reconnaissance was also useful in spotting areas of food cultivation in the jungle. [Karl<br />

Hack, ‘British Intelligence and Counter-Insurgency in the Era of Decolonisation: The Example<br />

of Malaya’, Intelligence and National Security 14, 1999, pp. 124—155, p. 148 & footnote 23.]<br />

626 UKNA CO 1022/317 — Supply of Arms to Bandits in Malaya, Abstract of Intelligence 16—31<br />

October 1951.<br />

627 The Attack class patrol boat project was not commenced until September 1965, its genesis,<br />

apparently, was experience gained in Confrontation, rather than the Malayan Emergency.<br />

[Stevens, <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Navy</strong>, pp. 199—201.]<br />

628 NAA A1209/23, Item 1957/4152 — Strategic basis of <strong>Australian</strong> defence policy 1953, Defence<br />

Committee Minute 368/1952 of 8 January 53. ‘Indo-China is the key to the defence of South<br />

East Asia as it provides defence in depth of Australia and New Zealand’. [paragraph 35.]<br />

‘Allied military measures in South East Asia should be based on coordinated agreed regional<br />

policy’. [paragraph 44.] ‘Australia is Safe Unless Malaya Falls’. [paragraph 45.] Almost<br />

343

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!