06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

seTTing The scene - The Ran and iTs inTelligence diVisiOn TO 1939<br />

The responsibility for defence of the sea routes on the Australia Station rested with<br />

CNS, and this force could not provide enough warships to convoy every merchant ship.<br />

In the Indian Ocean, where the intensity of enemy attacks on trade was expected to be<br />

only sporadic, many ships would have to sail independently. The <strong>Australian</strong> command<br />

organisation for its naval forces mirrored that of the British. CNS, who was also the<br />

First Naval Member of the <strong>Australian</strong> Commonwealth Naval Board (ACNB), exercised<br />

operational command of the RAN and of Imperial ships assigned to the Australia Station.<br />

He was thus both an operational commander of forces and the executive head of the<br />

RAN. <strong>Australian</strong> ships leaving the station would transfer to the operational command<br />

of the appropriate station commander, such as Commander-in-Chief China Station.<br />

At a joint level, Area Command Headquarters (ACH) were set up in Melbourne,<br />

Fremantle and Darwin to facilitate close cooperation between the RAN and the RAAF<br />

in maritime operations.<br />

CNS delegated operational control of naval forces on the Australia Station to the<br />

Rear Admiral Commanding <strong>Australian</strong> Squadron (RACAS), who usually exercised<br />

this control in one of the cruisers as flagship. He directed forces assigned to him on<br />

tasks and operations approved by CNS. This arrangement worked far from smoothly.<br />

Throughout 1938, RACAS Wilfred Custance engaged the Naval Board in a series of<br />

exchanges regarding his responsibilities in the event of war. 50 Separate arrangements<br />

were in place for the command and control of naval ports where Naval Officers-in-<br />

Charge (NOICs) had responsibility for naval affairs in their assigned ‘districts’. These<br />

included operation of Port War Signal Stations, harbour defences and the examination<br />

of ships entering the port. In wartime their responsibilities would be expanded to<br />

include the command of local defensive operations using assigned vessels, cooperation<br />

with the Army and RAAF in port security and defence, and the assembly and sailing<br />

of convoys and escorts. 51<br />

In August 1939, the Naval Board comprised two serving officers, Vice Admiral Sir<br />

Ragnar Colvin RN as First Naval Member, and Commodore Boucher as Second Naval<br />

Member. Mr A R Nankervis was the Civil and Financial Member (and permanent head<br />

of the Department of the <strong>Navy</strong> after November 1939) and the Secretary was Mr G L<br />

Macandie. The Operations and Intelligence Staff , under Captain Joseph Burnett as<br />

Assistant Chief of the Naval Staff, consisted of twelive permenant officers, including<br />

Lieutenant Commander Rupert Long as DNI, Henry Burrell and George Oldham both<br />

staff officers. 52 The entire Naval Staff, including medical, naval stores, victualling,<br />

accounts, works, staff & industrial, engineering & construction and the personnel<br />

branches, stood at just 252. This was too small a staff to fight a war, but the Naval Staff<br />

was handicapped by the shortage of RAN officers of sufficient seniority and operational<br />

experience to undertake the additional staff workload. 53<br />

Thus was the RAN organised as events in Europe and the Far East continued a spiral of<br />

deterioration towards war. The manifest shortcomings in the organisation, manpower,<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!