06.04.2013 Views

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

Missing Pieces: - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 <strong>Missing</strong> <strong>Pieces</strong><br />

British intelligence on Italy was good, particularly on its navy. The British cryptanalysis<br />

organisation, the Government Code and Cipher School (GC&CS), had broken Italian<br />

naval codes during the Abyssinian Crisis of 1938, and the British Mediterranean<br />

Fleet had an active program of intelligence collection. As well, the RN had gained<br />

experience of opposing elements of the Italian Fleet during the Spanish Civil War, and<br />

had also managed to get a close look at some of the Italian ships. 69 However, the British<br />

had greatly overestimated the degree to which the Italian <strong>Navy</strong> and Air Force could<br />

cooperate in maritime strike and support operations, and it was greatly concerned for<br />

the rough handling it anticipated from the latter. Despite this, in another illustration<br />

of the lack of executive response to threats revealed by intelligence, no apparent effort<br />

was made to strengthen the AA defences of the ships of the Mediterranean Fleet.<br />

These intelligence capabilities against the Italians suffered serious setbacks at the<br />

outbreak of war. First, the Italian <strong>Navy</strong> changed its codes and callsigns in early July<br />

1940, and the Mediterranean Fleet was afterwards forced to rely on traffic analysis, DF<br />

and callsign recovery for most of its intelligence in the first year of the war. 70 Second,<br />

the dearth of British air reconnaissance assets made detection and localisation of the<br />

Italian Fleet a very sporadic matter. The Commander-in-Chief of the Mediterranean<br />

Fleet, Admiral Andrew Cunningham, was strongly inclined to take the offensive against<br />

the Italians, but was handicapped by a lack of aircraft and a somewhat unbalanced order<br />

of battle. 71 The vulnerability of Malta, just 60nm from Sicily, to air attack also forced<br />

him to withdraw most of the fleet to Alexandria in Egypt, which made reconnaissance<br />

of Italian Fleet bases even more difficult.<br />

British strategy therefore developed two main features. The first was to bring the<br />

Italian battle fleet to action at a place and time of Cunningham’s choosing, with<br />

strongly supported convoys between Alexandria and Malta and Gibraltar and Malta<br />

the bait. The second was the conduct of offensive sweeps through areas likely to be<br />

frequented by Italian commercial shipping, and the bombardment of Italian shore<br />

facilities in the Dodecanese by fast groups of cruisers and destroyers. These were<br />

designed to seize and hold the initiative locally, while tempting Italian ships to battle<br />

in smaller formations.<br />

Sydney joined the Mediterranean Fleet in May 1940, and had already participated in<br />

sweeps along the African coast and towards the Adriatic, as well as the successful Battle<br />

of Calabria on 9 July. On 17 July she was ordered with five destroyers to conduct a sweep<br />

around Crete and off Piraeus, the port of Athens. Cunningham was a strong believer in<br />

giving his commanders as few written orders as possible, and Sydney’s captain, John<br />

Collins, stated that he was despatched on this mission with verbal orders, confirmed<br />

only by a sailing signal. 72 Collins was to provide support for a division of four British<br />

destroyers conducting a night anti-submarine patrol north of Crete, before proceeding<br />

with another destroyer to an area off Piraeus, and then returning to Alexandria.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!