17.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GRANT OF PRIVILEGE AND PERMISSION TO PRINT<br />

The Parlement itself never expressed any opinion on the merits of the books<br />

for which it granted privileges.<br />

On occasion, the Parlement might authorise the publication<br />

of one<br />

contentious work and forbid another. Thus on 18 March 1517 it allowed a<br />

petition by Bonaventura Nepveu for permission to publish his Tractatulus dictus<br />

deffensorium Fratrum Minorum de Observantia (Paris, Regnault Chaudiere, 1517,<br />

1<br />

8 ) and forbade the publication of Boniface de Ceva's pamphlet on the other<br />

side, in the long-running dispute before the Parlement between the rival<br />

groups of Franciscans. This was not a privilege: reprints of Nepveu's work<br />

were not forbidden.<br />

THE PREVOT OF PARIS AND ROYAL OFFICERS IN THE<br />

PROVINCES<br />

In the court of the Prevot at the Chatelet of Paris publications of a very slight<br />

and ephemeral nature were sometimes granted privileges, though for a short<br />

period of time. But there are also instances of publishers obtaining a simple<br />

conge or permission for small books and pamphlets on affairs of current public<br />

interest. A flurry of such publications reflected public interest in Louis XII's<br />

campaigns in Italy and the concern of royal publicists that the king's actions<br />

should be supported by his people. 2 The firm in Lyon or Paris which was first<br />

with news of events and with informed discussion of them might well hope to<br />

sell a large number of copies quickly. Among them was L 'Arme'e du roy qu 'il avoit<br />

centre les Venitiens, an account of the battle of Agnadello, printed by Martin<br />

Alexandre in Paris 'sous le congie de monseigneur le prevost ou son<br />

lieutenant' (PR 1509, 4*), and the (Euvre nouvellement translatee de Italienne rime<br />

celebrating the king's spectacular entry into Milan, printed with 'conge et<br />

licence' by Noel Abraham in Lyon (PR 1509, 5*). Apparently this was<br />

something less than a privilege, since no mention is made of forbidding other<br />

members of the book-trade to print or sell these items. What good, then, was a<br />

conge to the applicant? Was it likely to give him at least some initial advantage,<br />

and to that extent deter possible competitors from immediately copying it?<br />

Certainly prospective purchasers might opt for an edition which advertised a<br />

conge. It was evidence of official approval, and guaranteed that the contents<br />

were neither subversive nor wildly inaccurate. Its main use on the other hand<br />

may have been to secure the position of the publisher, who, in dealing in such<br />

'hot' news, may sometimes himself have feared to disseminate material which<br />

might prove to be unwelcome to the authorities. Another possibility is that the<br />

1 Sainte-Genevieve D.8". 1 1.066 Res. (piece 2). The arret, in the form of Letters Patent in Latin<br />

issued as by the king in Parlement, is printed at the end, on ff. xxx verso and xxxi.<br />

2 See J. P. Seguin, L'information en France de Louis XII a Henri II, Travaux d'Humanisme et<br />

Renaissance, 44 (Geneva, 1961), pp. 29-30; Bernard Quilliet, Louis XII, pert du peuple (1986),<br />

P- 393-<br />

I 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!