17.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRIVILEGE-GRANTING AUTHORITIES IN FRANCE<br />

jointly with the procureur du rot was not followed again. The point<br />

had been<br />

settled, in principle. But the Parlement was to be found throughout this period<br />

consulting him on any special occasion when the case under consideration<br />

seemed to call for it, e.g. 'ouy sur ce le procureur general du roy' (PA 1525, 8,<br />

cf. PA 1526, 2). The Cour des Aides when granting a privilege, its only one<br />

during this time, did likewise (PA 1517, 4). The procureur du roi attached to the<br />

Parlement of Toulouse was similarly consulted, on at least one occasion,<br />

about the grant of a book privilege: 'Oye la responce et dire du procureur du<br />

roy' (PA 1517, 3). The procureur du roi who participated in the first grant of a<br />

book-privilege by the Parlement of Paris, Guillaume Roger, had then only just<br />

assumed his functions, his predecessor Jean Burdelot having died in office in<br />

March 1507. He held the position until 1523, so he may have contributed to a<br />

certain consistency of policy towards the granting of privileges. He may also<br />

have helped to ensure some uniformity of practice, in the early stages, between<br />

the Parlement and the private of Paris. He had ex officio to preside over the<br />

private if the office of Prevot fell vacant, and this happened twice, once on the<br />

death in September 1509 ofjacques d'Estouteville, who had been Prevot since<br />

1479, and again on the death ofjacques de Coligny in May 1512, the second<br />

term extending until March 1513 when Gabriel d'Allegre was appointed<br />

Prevot. 1<br />

The precedent thus established by the grant to Eustace de Brie did not<br />

unloose a flood of applications for book-privileges to the Parlement. There<br />

was however an application the following spring. It concerned a translation<br />

into French of the Pragmatic Sanction with a treatise on the plurality of<br />

benefices by Guillaume Perault. The beneficiary was Martin Alexandre 'and<br />

his partners' ('pour Martin Alixandre et ses censors'), and the term allowed<br />

was again one year, the colophon giving the date 12 April 1508 (PA 1508, i).<br />

Parlement of Paris, Grands Jours, Cour des Aides<br />

Signs of development in the Parlement privilege system appeared in 1509.<br />

Four privileges were granted. Two of these were obtained by leading<br />

University booksellers. These two are the first Parlement privileges of which<br />

the complete text is known. In each case an authenticated Extraict des registres<br />

de Parlement is printed prominently in the book itself, an example which was<br />

destined to be followed by most though not quite all subsequent holders of<br />

such privileges. The first was an edition of a work attributed to St Bruno, an<br />

Expositio on the Epistles of St Paul, printed and published by Berthold<br />

Rembolt, a much-respected printer who had originally come to Paris to work<br />

with Ulrich Gering, the proto-typographer of France (PA 1509, i). The<br />

second was a new work by the Scottish scholastic philosopher John Mair or<br />

1 See below, p. 52.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!