17.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DATING AND DURATION OF PRIVILEGES<br />

There are however two instances, neither of them recorded in the extant<br />

registers of the Parlemcnt, where a privilege had evidently been granted for a<br />

whole group of books on the same occasion, one for four books and the other<br />

for five. Comparison between books all claiming a privilege given by the<br />

Parlement to the same publisher on the same date, and authenticated by the<br />

same signatory, makes this clear. The first of them was granted to Guillaume<br />

Eustace on 6 September 1512 (PA 1512, 9(1-4)). It is printed in full by<br />

Eustace in the Stilus parlamenti curie, drawn up originally by Guillermus de<br />

text<br />

Brolio, and edited by Antoine Robert, the greffier criminel of the court. ' The<br />

of the privilege, as printed in the book itself, speaks only of this particular<br />

facerent Stilum dicte nostre curie in<br />

book, 'ne imprimerent seu imprimere<br />

latino per se nuper impressum'. But we find exactly the same privilege issued<br />

on 6 September 1512 and signed by Robert, in a translation into Latin of the<br />

Farce of Pathelin, Comedia noua que Veterator inscribitur, alias Pathelinus, also<br />

published by Guillaume Eustace, this time mentioning only the Comedia noua<br />

and making no reference to the Stilus. And it is claimed in two other<br />

publications of Guillaume Eustace, an Ordinatio seu declaratio facta super xiii<br />

punctis stili, and the Ordonnances de parlement touchant tous especialement les parties qui<br />

y out a plaidier (1512). One can only conclude that the original privilege of 6<br />

September 1512 covered all four publications, and that Guillaume Eustace,<br />

seeing no reason to mention all four in reprinting the text of the privilege,<br />

omitted the three other titles. At least the 'package' sought by Eustace had a<br />

certain coherence: all the items included in it were directly connected with the<br />

Parlement itself, even the Farce of Pathelin, since the play probably originated<br />

in the Basoche or social club of the Paris law students and included<br />

scenes in court, with the presiding magistrate ending the case by inviting the<br />

'rogue' advocate Pathelin to dinner. A privilege of three books can also be<br />

detected among the Parlement grants for 1517 (PA 1517, 9). These were three<br />

separate works on Aristotle by the Spanish Paris theologian Juan de Celaya,<br />

one published with the date 1517 and two with the date 1518; the publisher,<br />

Hemon Le Fevre, displayed in each of the three books a privilege granted by<br />

the Parlement on 3 1 December 1517, the Extraict des registres signed by Antoine<br />

Robert. Finally, there appears in several books published between 1519 and<br />

1523 by Claude Chevallon a two-year Parlement privilege dated 29 August<br />

1519 and authenticated by Robert (in one of them misprinted Robertet, the<br />

name of an important royal secretary of state, the compositor having perhaps<br />

heard ofhim and taken the paraph after Robert's signature for 'et'). The latest<br />

book to show it is a collection of Sunday sermons, Sermones dominicales, by the<br />

Dominican theologian Guillaume Pepin, a popular preacher, which was<br />

completed by Chevallon on 18 June 1523. On the verso of the title-page is<br />

printed the 'Extraict des registres de Parlement': the only<br />

1 See<br />

above, p. 70.<br />

I 3 8<br />

book there

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!