17.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SEEKING AND GRANTING PRIVILEGES<br />

grants (e.g. PA 1509, i) and it never had a consistent policy about price<br />

regulation in them. I have noticed fourteen examples of imposing a maximum<br />

price, and five of them are in 1516. Possibly some of the conseillers attached<br />

more importance to price control than others.<br />

The maximum price, when specified, is expressed in terms of the livre<br />

tournois (l.t.) or of the livre parisis (l.p.). These pounds were made up of 20 solidi<br />

or sous, each of these worth 1 2 denarii or deniers. The livre tournois was worth<br />

sixteen sous parisis, while the livre parisis was traditionally twenty-five sous<br />

tournois.<br />

The question first arose when the greffiers of Orleans petitioned for a<br />

privilege to have the Coutumes of the bailliage of Orleans printed (PA 1510, 2).<br />

They themselves proposed that the court should determine a reasonable<br />

price. It was decided that each copy should be sold at five s.t. ('pourveu<br />

qu'ils ne les pourront vendre que V s.ts. piece'). Subsequently the Parlement<br />

standardised on a maximum price of three s.t. unbound and four s.t. bound<br />

for the Coutumes of Auvergne (PA 1511, i), Chaumont (PA 1511, 4), Paris<br />

(PA 1513, 2), Vitry (PA 1516, i), and Troyes (PA 1516, 7). In the case of the<br />

Coutume of Paris, the Parlement thought the matter of sufficient importance to<br />

depute two conseillers to examine the printed copies, and only on receiving their<br />

report and recommendation ten days later did the court fix the price. We see<br />

from this case too that anyone disregarding the maximum price was liable to<br />

confiscation of the books and an amende arbitraire the same penalty as<br />

threatened anyone infringing the privilege. No mention is made of a<br />

maximum price in the grant given for the Coutume of Bourbonnais (PA 1522,<br />

6), but the Coutume of Blois was to be sold 'a prix raisonnable' (PA 1524, 1 1).<br />

It is evident that a great many people had to buy these Coutumes, and the<br />

temptation to overcharge was very real. The same sort of preoccupation no<br />

doubt explains the trouble that the Parlement took over the synodal statutes of<br />

Orleans, which the clergy of the diocese would have to buy. Chevallon's requete<br />

was granted, to be allowed to sell them, with privilege, but only 'oy le rapport<br />

de certains commissaires commis a visiter ledit livre et s'enquerre du pris<br />

auquel il devrait estre vendu', as a result of which the price was fixed at a<br />

maximum of twelve d.p. (PA 1525, 6). The certified copy of the privilege<br />

which Chevallon obtained, and which he printed, did not include these<br />

particulars, but they are known from the entry in the register of the Parlement.<br />

The earliest non-official work to be assigned a maximum price was Olivier<br />

de La Marche, Leparement des dames de honneur (PA 1510,3). This was to be sold<br />

at not more than three s.t. More substantial publications, which obviously<br />

cost more to print, were allowed a higher maximum price. A work of<br />

scholastic philosophy could be charged at six s.t. (PA 1514, 2), a legal<br />

commentary at eight s.t. (PA 1514, 3), a critical edition of Quintilian with<br />

commentary at sixteen s.t. (PA 1516, 2). Other maximum prices, fixed in<br />

terms of livres parisis, are two s.p. for a slim volume of Latin verse (PA 1514, 5),<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!