17.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REPRINTS AFTER EXPIRY OF A PRIVILEGE<br />

edition, dated 3 July 1528, printing his privilege of 4 September 1527 on the<br />

verso of the title-page and the terms of the Parlement arret of 6 June 1528,<br />

upholding his claim to it, on the facing page. The arret refers to Pontac's<br />

edition only as 'les coustumes de Bourdeaulx par luy faictes imprimer a Paris'<br />

and makes no mention of the royal privilege which Pontac had obtained for it.<br />

Pontac would have been free to sell his edition as soon as Guyart's privilege<br />

had expired. Why, knowing better than anyone what his Parlement had<br />

granted Guyart, did Pontac go to the lengths of obtaining a royal privilege and<br />

having an edition printed at his own expense? Guyart was evidently very<br />

dilatory in taking up his privilege and 1<br />

printing the Coutumes. Pontac may<br />

have begun to think that he was not going to do so at all. Meanwhile the many<br />

people who needed a copy of the revised Coutumes may well have been<br />

complaining, and the greffier would be at the receiving end of the complaints.<br />

Whatever the reason for his initiative, the reason for the grant of a royal<br />

privilege to him is clear enough. There were plenty of precedents for the<br />

grejfiers receiving a privilege in respect of Coutumes and Pontac's application to<br />

the royal chancery would have seemed perfectly normal in the absence of any<br />

statement from him that a privilege had already been granted to someone else<br />

by the Parlement of Bordeaux.<br />

REPRINTS AFTER EXPIRY OF A PRIVILEGE<br />

A certain number of cases have been noticed, in the course of preparing the<br />

present work, of reprints being brought out by other publishers soon after the<br />

lapse of a privilege, sometimes so soon after that it can hardly be coincidence,<br />

that is, that a colleague was only waiting for the privilege to run out before<br />

copying the book. Here are some examples.<br />

The first edition of the Coutumes of Maine came out in Paris with a privilege<br />

dated 7 September 1509 (PA 1509, 4), granted to Martin Le Saige, thegrejfier.<br />

It was to run for two years, so it expired on 6 1 1 1 . September 5 By 7 May 1513,<br />

a reprint had been completed by Martin Morin at Rouen (BN Res. F. 2345).<br />

This reprint reproduces word for word the conclusion of the original edition,<br />

which recorded the transcribing of the Coutume by Martin Le Saige, and the<br />

and to take<br />

permission given to him by the Parlement to have it printed<br />

whatever profit there might be in so doing: only the formula at the end, which<br />

forbade other printers to copy it for two years, was omitted, Le Saige's<br />

exclusive right in the copy having by then expired.<br />

1<br />

J. Delpit, Origines de I'imprimerie en Guyenne (Bordeaux, 1869), pp. 39-43, first drew attention to<br />

this case, followed by A. Claudin, Les et les<br />

origines<br />

debuts de I'imprimerie a Bordeaux (1897),<br />

pp. 45-6. Delpit seems to imply that he had seen the originals of the entries printed by Guyart<br />

in the registers of the Parlement of Bordeaux. At the present day the series of the registers,<br />

preserved in the Archives de la Gironde, is incomplete, and there is a gap between Vol. xix<br />

(which ends at 16 September 1524) and Vol. xx (which begins May 1528), and a gap in Vol. xx<br />

from 30 May to 4 September 1528.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!