Untitled - Monoskop
Untitled - Monoskop
Untitled - Monoskop
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REPRINTS AFTER EXPIRY OF A PRIVILEGE<br />
edition, dated 3 July 1528, printing his privilege of 4 September 1527 on the<br />
verso of the title-page and the terms of the Parlement arret of 6 June 1528,<br />
upholding his claim to it, on the facing page. The arret refers to Pontac's<br />
edition only as 'les coustumes de Bourdeaulx par luy faictes imprimer a Paris'<br />
and makes no mention of the royal privilege which Pontac had obtained for it.<br />
Pontac would have been free to sell his edition as soon as Guyart's privilege<br />
had expired. Why, knowing better than anyone what his Parlement had<br />
granted Guyart, did Pontac go to the lengths of obtaining a royal privilege and<br />
having an edition printed at his own expense? Guyart was evidently very<br />
dilatory in taking up his privilege and 1<br />
printing the Coutumes. Pontac may<br />
have begun to think that he was not going to do so at all. Meanwhile the many<br />
people who needed a copy of the revised Coutumes may well have been<br />
complaining, and the greffier would be at the receiving end of the complaints.<br />
Whatever the reason for his initiative, the reason for the grant of a royal<br />
privilege to him is clear enough. There were plenty of precedents for the<br />
grejfiers receiving a privilege in respect of Coutumes and Pontac's application to<br />
the royal chancery would have seemed perfectly normal in the absence of any<br />
statement from him that a privilege had already been granted to someone else<br />
by the Parlement of Bordeaux.<br />
REPRINTS AFTER EXPIRY OF A PRIVILEGE<br />
A certain number of cases have been noticed, in the course of preparing the<br />
present work, of reprints being brought out by other publishers soon after the<br />
lapse of a privilege, sometimes so soon after that it can hardly be coincidence,<br />
that is, that a colleague was only waiting for the privilege to run out before<br />
copying the book. Here are some examples.<br />
The first edition of the Coutumes of Maine came out in Paris with a privilege<br />
dated 7 September 1509 (PA 1509, 4), granted to Martin Le Saige, thegrejfier.<br />
It was to run for two years, so it expired on 6 1 1 1 . September 5 By 7 May 1513,<br />
a reprint had been completed by Martin Morin at Rouen (BN Res. F. 2345).<br />
This reprint reproduces word for word the conclusion of the original edition,<br />
which recorded the transcribing of the Coutume by Martin Le Saige, and the<br />
and to take<br />
permission given to him by the Parlement to have it printed<br />
whatever profit there might be in so doing: only the formula at the end, which<br />
forbade other printers to copy it for two years, was omitted, Le Saige's<br />
exclusive right in the copy having by then expired.<br />
1<br />
J. Delpit, Origines de I'imprimerie en Guyenne (Bordeaux, 1869), pp. 39-43, first drew attention to<br />
this case, followed by A. Claudin, Les et les<br />
origines<br />
debuts de I'imprimerie a Bordeaux (1897),<br />
pp. 45-6. Delpit seems to imply that he had seen the originals of the entries printed by Guyart<br />
in the registers of the Parlement of Bordeaux. At the present day the series of the registers,<br />
preserved in the Archives de la Gironde, is incomplete, and there is a gap between Vol. xix<br />
(which ends at 16 September 1524) and Vol. xx (which begins May 1528), and a gap in Vol. xx<br />
from 30 May to 4 September 1528.