17.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

Untitled - Monoskop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRIVILEGE-GRANTING AUTHORITIES IN FRANCE<br />

number of books known to have been published under these privileges appears<br />

to be 127. The number of grants had reached ten per year by 1512. Thereafter<br />

there was no tendency to increase. There were, however, fluctuations. The<br />

grave circumstances in France in 1 523-4 are reflected in a drop to one in 1 523,<br />

followed by a leap to fourteen in 1524, falling back to nine in 1525 and three in<br />

1526. Normally the annual number of grants varied from three to ten.<br />

Many of these grants are known only from the printed books themselves, in<br />

which a transcript is provided of the certified copy of the court's decision.<br />

Only forty-four of the 102 grants made by the Parlement of Paris have been<br />

found recorded in the registers of the Parlement. On the other hand the<br />

registers record a couple of grants for items which have not survived or<br />

perhaps were never published (e.g. PA 1524, GA), and they can sometimes<br />

prove that the Parlement was the authority for the privilege where the book<br />

itself bears only the words 'Cum priuilegio' (e.g. PA 1512, 7). The absence of<br />

an entry in the registers is not in itself remarkable. It is by no means unheard<br />

of for a judgement of the Parlement, even concerning an important lawsuit,<br />

and even when the registers were very well kept, to be unrecorded in the<br />

surviving volumes of the registers. 1 Such a high proportion of omissions as<br />

that occurring in the case of the book-privileges can however hardly be an<br />

accident. Either some of the conseillers thought the grant of such a privilege of<br />

enough consequence to be entered in the main register, while others did not,<br />

or else the applicant himself chose whether or not to ask for permanent<br />

registration of his privilege, which was after all a short-term concession never<br />

valid for more than four years at most, no doubt paying an extra fee<br />

accordingly if he opted for registration. In the seventeenth century, when the<br />

Parlement no longer had the right to grant privileges on its own authority, it<br />

was still often called upon by beneficiaries to register privileges obtained from<br />

the royal chancery. 2 This procedure was not universal or compulsory, and it<br />

was an extra expense, but it was adopted by privilege-holders who thought<br />

their grants especially likely to be contested. Such considerations may well, in<br />

the earlier period, have influenced authors and publishers who had obtained<br />

privileges from the Parlement itself, in deciding whether or not to ask for the<br />

grant to be incorporated in the registers in their final and permanent form.<br />

For a lawcourt to grant book-privileges at all was most unusual in the<br />

context of the privilege-system as it had been growing up in the rest of Europe.<br />

How then had the French Parlement come to give them?<br />

The Parlement of Paris was the highest court of appeal for the kingdom of<br />

France. Its duty of checking and registering all royal edicts and ordinances<br />

1<br />

E.g. English suits before the Parlement of Paris 1420-1436, ed. C. T. Allmand and C. A. J.<br />

Armstrong, Camden Fourth Series, xxvi (Royal Historical Society, 1982), p. 25, n. 17.<br />

2<br />

H.-J. Martin, Lime, pouvoirs et societe' a Paris au xvii' siecle, Publications du Centre de recherches<br />

d'Histoire et de Philologie de la iv Section de 1'Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Paris: vi,<br />

Histoire et civilisation du livre, 3 (Geneva), 1969, i, p. 448.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!