14.06.2013 Views

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

1 The Birth of Science - MSRI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

136 5. Medicine and Other Empirical <strong>Science</strong>s<br />

cause he regards the words as synonymous, he reproaches Herophilus for<br />

unwisely juxtaposing them as if they had distinct meanings. 49<br />

To these men language had again become an external body <strong>of</strong> information<br />

which they could not influence except unconsciously. This is an<br />

important aspect <strong>of</strong> the death <strong>of</strong> the scientific method.<br />

5.6 Botany and Zoology<br />

Zoology and botany gained great impetus from Alexander the Great’s<br />

conquests, which made possible the systematic study <strong>of</strong> many animal and<br />

plant species unknown or little known to classical Greece. Alexander himself<br />

had ensured that specimens <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna from the regions he<br />

crossed, especially in his Indian campaign, were sent home so they could<br />

be studied.<br />

Hellenistic botany and zoology had an important precursor: Aristotle’s<br />

research. <strong>The</strong> philosopher’s teleological world view did not, in this area,<br />

prevent the collection <strong>of</strong> interesting results. Whereas, as already noticed,<br />

his anatomy was obstructed by a static concept <strong>of</strong> language, this was not<br />

such a problem in zoology, where Greek names for animals provided a<br />

fairly suitable conceptual scheme. Aristotle not only described about five<br />

hundred animal species based on observations ranging from morphological<br />

to behavioral, 50 but he also recognized that animal life varies along a<br />

continuum, and so introduced a “natural classification scheme” for zoology.<br />

51<br />

<strong>The</strong>ophrastus, who was for decades Aristotle’s favorite disciple and page 179<br />

succeeded the master at the head <strong>of</strong> the Lyceum, devoted himself to many<br />

subjects, including meteorology, mineralogy, and above all botany. His<br />

two surviving botanical treatises, Historia plantarum and De causis plantarum,<br />

contain the elements <strong>of</strong> a theory (in the empirical-science sense) <strong>of</strong><br />

botanical physiology, built both on the gathering <strong>of</strong> ancient empirical lore<br />

and on recent observations and experiments.<br />

<strong>The</strong>ophrastus discusses at length the modifications that living beings<br />

can undergo between generations. 52 Morphological variations <strong>of</strong> plants<br />

due to changes in soil or climate are clearly distinguished from spontaneous<br />

changes; <strong>The</strong>ophrastus stresses that mutations <strong>of</strong> the second type,<br />

49<br />

Caelius Aurelianus, Celeres vel acutae passiones, I, pref. 4–5 = [von Staden: H], text 211.<br />

50<br />

Aristotle, Historia animalium. Many observations can be found in his other zoological works<br />

as well.<br />

51<br />

On the subject <strong>of</strong> classification criteria, the salient texts are the Historia animalium and the first<br />

book <strong>of</strong> the De partibus animalium.<br />

52 <strong>The</strong>ophrastus, Historia plantarum, II, iii.<br />

Revision: 1.9 Date: 2002/09/14 19:12:01

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!